CourtMesh

Amendment to Maharashtra Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 Rule 17, 18, 55A & Form 604

State Notification of Maharashtra · 20057,187 characters of text

The enactment

TypeNotification
Year2005
JurisdictionState of Maharashtra
MinistryGovt of Maharashtra
StatusIn force as published by the source
TextPublished as one document, as the source published it
Subjectstaxation

Full text

The source publishes this enactment as a single document rather than provision by provision, so the whole text is below and there are no per-section pages for it. Nothing has been shortened.

WERTE TITE TAT SETETIOT W -0, T 30, Q0R0/491Td Ro, T 2332 v FINANCE DEPARTMENT Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032, dated 30th April 2010, NOTIFICATION MaHARASHTRA VALUE ADDED Tax AcT, 2002. No.VAT-1510/CR-53/Taxation-1.—Whereas the Government of Maharashtrais satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary to take immediate action further to amend the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Rules, 2005, and to dispense with the condition of previous publication thereof under the proviso to sub-section (4) of section 83 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (Mah. IX of 2005) (hercinafter referred to as “the said Act”). Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) read with the proviso to sub-section (4) of section 83 of the said Act, and of all other powers enabling it in this behalf, the Government of Mabharashtra is hereby, make the following rules further to amend the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Rules, 2005, namely :—

1. (1) These rules may be called the Maharashtra Value Added Tax (Second Amendment) Rules, 2010.

(2) They shall come into force with effect from 1st May 2010,

2. In rule 17 of the Maharashtra Value. Added Tax Rules, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as “the principal Rules”), in sub-rule (4),—

(1) inclause (@), in sub-clause (i), for the words “twenty-one days” the words “thirty days” shall be substituted;

(2) in clause (b), for.the words “twenty-one days” the words “thirty days” shall be substituted.

3. I rule 18 of the principal Rules, in'sub-rule (1),—

(1) for the words “end of the six-monthly period”, at both the places where they occur, the words “end of the quarter” shall be substituted;

(2) for the words “six-monthly” at both the places where they occur, the words “quarterly” shall be substituted. < FERTE FITE AT SRTLUT ST -8, YW 30, R0¢0/39Ta Lo, Wk 1337

4. After rule 55 of the principal Rules, the following rule shall be inserted, namely :— “85A. Conditions and restrictions for grant of refund.—

(1) Where a claimant dealer has filed an application for refund under sub-section () of section 51, in FORM 501 and if it is noticed by the Commissioner that,—

(a) the tax has not been paid on’the earlier sales in respect of the transactions on which the dealer has claimed set-off or, as the case may be, refund, or

(b) the claimant dealer has not received the declarations or certificates in support of the sales or the dispatches otherwise than by way of sales as covered under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, then the Commissioner may, reduce the quantum of refund and grant only the balance amount of refund.

(2) The said reduction shall be equal to the aggregate of the quantum of set-off or, as the case may be, refund claimed on the purchase of the goods in respect of which tax has not been paid on the earlier sales and additional tax liability, if any, under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 on account of non-production of the said declarations or certificates”.

5. Rule 87 of the principal Rules, shall be renumbered as sub-rule (1) thercof; and after sub-rule (1) as so renumbered, the following sub-rule shall be added, namely :(— “(2) The intimation for the purposes of sub-section (7) of section 63 shall be in FORM 604”.

6. After FORM 603 appended to the principal Rules, the following FORM shall be added, namely:— “FORM 604 [see rule 67 (2)] Intimation under sub-section (7) of section 63 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. To, FETT T TSI SRR W 93, Y 3o, 0R0/3MRa to, WHRRFX % No. ———/———/Intimation/Sec-63(7)/B—————Mumbai, Dated:- Registration Number {TIN) under MVAT Act, 2002. Registration Number (TIN) under CST Act, 1956, From To Period Y O A Sub.— Intimation under sub-section (7) of section 63. Gentlemern/Sir/Madam, You are aware that this office has initiated proceedings as per the provisions of section ........... of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act,

2002. As a result of scrutiny and verification of :—

1. Returns filed by you,

2. Books of account maintained by you, and

3. Other documents ete, it is observed that the-tax payable as disclosed by you in the returns/ books of account, set-off or. refund claimed by you appears to be incorrect as stated below:- TABLE-1 SUMMARY OF ADDITIONAL TAX LIABILITY OR REFUND Sr., Particulars As per return As Difference No. observed under Audit

(1) (2) (3) ) (5)

(1) Gross Turn-over of Sales(Rs.)

(2) Gross Turn-over of purchases (Rs.)

(3) Total Taxes payable (Rs.)

(4) Interest payable ws. 30(2)(Rs.)

(5) Total Amount Payable (Rs.)

(6) Less:- t TERTS YR TRAUS TG W AR-3, YRIA 30, [0R0/39TE g0, Wk 1332 @ @) @) ) (5)

(7) (a)Set-off claim (Rs.)

(b) Taxes paid with return (Rs.) () Other available Credits (Rs.)

(8) Balance Amount payable (Rs.)

(9) Add: Interest u/s. 30(4)* (Rs.)

(10) Balance Amount Refundable (Rs.) TABLE 2 REASONS FOR ADDITONAL TAX LAIBLITY OR REFUND Sr. Findings as per verification or Asobserved Additional No. scrutiny after Tax verificationor amount scrutiny of books of account 1) 2 3) )

1. Taxrelated findings— () Difference in taxable turnover (Rs.) (®) Turn-over on which dealer has applied incorrect rate of tax (Rs.) (¢} Disallowance of claim of Goods return (Rs.)

(d) Sales of Capital Assets (Rs.)

(e) Excess collection of taxes, if any (Rs.) (f Disallowance of claim on account of incorrect deductions (Rs.} (@ Others (Please Specify) (Rs.) TETRT TR (AT SATER] VAT TR-3, THA 30, 2082/3900 Ro, b 2RI 34 [¢Y] 2 (3) 4) @

(i) (it} (iv}

2. Set-off related—

(a) Non-production of tax invoices (Rs.)

(b) Credit notes not considered (Rs.)

(c) Turn-over of Purchases return.

(d) Reduction under rule 53 not considered or considered wrongly. (Rs.) {e) Denial of set-off under rule 54 not considered (Rs.)

(f) Others (Please Specify) (Rs.) W

(i) (&)

(iv)

3. Additional Tax liability on account of 1& 2above— Add:- Interest u/s. 30(2) (Rs.) Add:- Interest u/s. 30(4) * (Rs.) Total additional amount payable (Rs.) Add: Excess refund granted to the dealer. (Rs.)

8. Total amount payable (Rs.)

9. Total amount Refundable (Rs.) *If dealer agrees with-the contents of this intimation then the liability on account of interest u/s. 30(4) is to be discharged at the time of filing of return or revised return. R S In view of this if you agree with the aforesaid findings you are advised to file a return or, as the case may be, revised returns within 30 days from the receipt of this intimation in respect of the period from R WERTE YT T STETHTOT Wi 9=, Ui 3o, R0%o0/dyr R0, TH R]IR to ——— after taking into account the contents of the intimation. If you fail to file return or revised return your case shall be taken for assessment and may attract penal provisions as per section 29(3). Yours faithfully, Date: Place: Signature and Designation.” By order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra, CHITRA KULKARNI, Officer on Special Duty to Government. ON BEHALF OF GOVERNMENT PRINTING, STATIONERY AND PUBLICATION. PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY SHRI PARSHURAM JAGANNATIT GOSAVL, PRINTED AT GOVERNMENT CENTRAL PRESS, 21-A, NETAJL SUBHASH ROAD, CHARNI ROAD, MUMBAT 400 004 AND PUBLISHED AT DIRECTORATE OF GOVERNMENT PRINTING, STATIONERY AND PUBLICATION, 21-A, NETAJI SUBHASH ROAD, CHARNI ROAD, MUMBAI 400 004 EDITOR - SHRI PARSHURAM JAGANNATH GOSAV1.

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? Amendment to Maharashtra Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 Rule 17, 18, 55A & Form 604 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.