CourtMesh

Section 21: Termination of service of officers by the Central Government on grounds other than mis-conduct - (1) When the Director General is satisfied that an officer is unsuitable to be retained in service, the officer

Border Security Force Rule, 1969Central Rules · 1968

(a) shall be so informed;

(b) shall be furnished with particulars of all matters adverse to him; and

(c) shall be called upon to urge any reasons he may wish to put forward in favour of his retention in the service:

Provided that clauses (a), (b) and (c) shall not apply, if the Central Government is satisfied that, for reasons, to be recorded by it in writing, it is not expedient or reasonably practicable to comply with the provisions thereof:

Provided further that the Director-General may not furnish to the officer any matter adverse to him, if in his opinion, it is not in the interest of the security of the state to do so.

(2) In the event of the explanation being considered by the Director General unsatisfactory, the matter shall be submitted to the Central Government for orders, together with the officer’s explanation and the recommendation of the Director-General.

BSF RULES 82

(3) The Central Government after considering the reports, the explanation, if any, of the officer and the recommendation of the Director General, may call upon the officer to retire or resign and on his refusing to do so, the officer may be compulsorily retired from the service with pension or gratuity, if any, admissible to him.

22. Dismissal or removal of persons other than officers on account of mis-conduct - (1) When it is proposed to terminate the service of a person subject to the Act other than an officer, he shall be given an opportunity by the authority competent to dismiss or remove him, to show cause in the manner specified in sub-rule

(2) against such action:

Provided that this sub-rule shall not apply -

(a) where the service is terminated on the ground of conduct which has led to his conviction by a criminal court or a Security Force Court; or

(b) where the competent authority is satisfied that, for reasons to be recorded in writing, it is not expedient or reasonably practicable to give the person concerned an opportunity or showing cause.

(2) When after considering the reports on the mis-conduct of the person concerned, the competent authority is satisfied that the trial of such a person is inexpedient or impracticable, but, is of the opinion that his further retention in the service is undesirable, it shall so inform him together with all reports adverse to him and he shall be called upon to submit, in writing, his explanation and defence:

Provided that the competent authority may withhold from disclosure any such report or portion thereof, if, in his opinion its disclosure is not in the public interest.

(3) The competent authority after considering his explanation and defence if any may dismiss or remove him from service with or without pension:

BSF RULES 83

Provided that a Deputy Inspector General shall not dismiss or remove from service, a Subordinate Officer of and above the rank of an Inspector.

(4) All cases of dismissal or removal under this rule, shall be reported to the Director General.]

Where this provision sits

ActBorder Security Force Rule, 1969
Section21
Marginal noteTermination of service of officers by the Central Government on grounds other than mis-conduct - (1) When the Director General is satisfied that an officer is unsuitable to be retained in service, the officer
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? Border Security Force Rule, 1969 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.