CourtMesh

Section 46: Attachment to another unit

Border Security Force Rule, 1969Central Rules · 1968

The Commandant shall not deal with any case :-

(i) where the offence with which the accused is charged is against the Commandant himself; or

(ii) where the Commandant is himself a witness in the case against the accused ; or

(iii) where the Commandant is otherwise personally interested in the case, and the accused shall be attached to another battalion or unit for disposal of the case under the order of the Deputy Inspector-General:

1. Ins. by SO 2628(E) dated 25th Nov 2011.

2. Ins by SO 55(E) dated 1st Feb 1999.

BSF RULES 99

Provided that a Commandant shall not be disqualified from hearing a charge merely because the offence was committed against the property of a Force Mess, band or institution of which the Commandant is a member or trustee or because the offence is one of disobedience of such Commandant’s orders.

1[Provided further that a person may also be attached to any Battalion, Unit, Headquarter or Establishment on the ground of any service exigency under orders of his Deputy InspectorGeneral or any other superior officer or Authority.]

Where this provision sits

ActBorder Security Force Rule, 1969
Section46
Marginal noteAttachment to another unit
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? Border Security Force Rule, 1969 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.