CourtMesh

Section 9: Sections 6, 7 and 8 not to confer right to insist document should be accepted in electronic form

THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 AmendmentUnion territory Act of Chandigarh · Act 21 of 2000

Nothing contained in sections 6, 7 and 8 shall confer a right upon any person to insist that any Ministry or Department of the Central Government or the State Government or any authority or body established by or under any law or controlled or funded by the Central or State Government should

1. Ins. by Act 10 of 2009 s. 7 (w.e.f. 27-10-2009).

2. Ins. by s. 8, ibid. (w.e.f. 27-10-2009).

11 accept, issue, create, retain and preserve any document in the form of electronic records or effect any monetary transaction in the electronic form.

Where this provision sits

ActTHE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 Amendment
Section9
Marginal noteSections 6, 7 and 8 not to confer right to insist document should be accepted in electronic form
JurisdictionUnion territory of Chandigarh
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 Amendment is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.