CourtMesh

Section 2: [Repealed.].

The Court-Fees Act, 1870Central Act · Act 7 of 1870

["Chief Controlling Revenue-authority" defined.] Rep. by the A. O. 1937.

STATE AMENDMENT

Orissa

Amendment of section 2 of Act (7 of 1870).--For section 2 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, hereinafter called the principal Act, the following section shall be substituted:--

"2. Definition.--In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,--

(1) 'appeal' includes a cross objection;

(2) 'suit' includes an appeal from a decree except in section 8-A."

[Vide Orissa Act 5 of 1939, s. 3]

Where this provision sits

ActThe Court-Fees Act, 1870
Section2
Marginal note[Repealed.].
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • substituted, Ben. 7 of 1935. . The s. 2 relating to repeal of enactments was rep. by the Repealing Act, 1870 (14 of 1870). A section defining Chief Controlling Revenue-authority was added by s. 2 of the Court-fees (Amendment) Act, 1901 (10 of 1901), and was slightly amended by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1917 (24 of 1917). For the definition of the Chief Controlling Revenue-authority see now the General Clauses Act, 1897…

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Court-Fees Act, 1870 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.