CourtMesh

Section 135: Evasion of duty or prohibitions.

The Customs Act, 1962Central Act · Act 52 of 1962

[(1) Without prejudice to any action that may be taken under this Act, if any person--

(a) is in relation to any goods in any way knowingly concerned in misdeclaration of value or in any fraudulent evasion or attempt at evasion of any duty chargeable thereon or of any prohibition for the time being imposed under this Act or any other law for the time being in force with respect to such goods; or

(b) acquires possession of or is in any way concerned in carrying, removing, depositing, harbouring, keeping, concealing, selling or purchasing or in any other manner dealing with any goods which he knows or has reason to believe are liable to confiscation under Section 111 or Section 113, as the case may be; or

(c) attempts to export any goods which he knows or has reason to believe are liable to confiscation under Section 113; or

(d) fraudulently avails of or attempts to avail of drawback or any exemption from duty provided under this Act in connection with [export of goods; or]

[(e) obtains an instrument from any authority by fraud, collusion, willful misstatement or suppression of facts and such instrument has been utilised by such person or any other person,],

he shall be punishable,--

(i) in the case of an offence relating to,--

(A) any goods the market price of which exceeds one crore of rupees; or

(B) the evasion or attempted evasion of duty exceeding [fifty lakh] of rupees; or

(C) such categories of prohibited goods as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify; or

(D) fraudulently availing of or attempting to avail of drawback or any exemption from duty referred to in clause (d), if the amount of drawback or exemption from duty exceeds [fifty lakh] [of rupees; or] with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years and with fine:

[(E) obtaining an instrument from any authority by fraud, collusion, willful misstatement or suppression of facts and such instrument has been utilised by any person, where the duty relatable to utilisation of the instrument exceeds fifty lakh rupees.]

Provided that in the absence of special and adequate reasons to the contrary to be recorded in the judgment of the court, such imprisonment shall not be for less than one year; (ii) in any other case, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.]

[(2) If any person convicted of an offence under this section or under sub-section (1) of section 136 is again convicted of an offence under this section, then, he shall be punishable for the second and for every subsequent offence with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years and with fine:

Provided that in the absence of special and adequate reasons to the contrary to be recorded in the judgment of the court such imprisonment shall not be for less than [one year].

(3) For the purposes of sub-sections (1) and (2), the following shall not be considered as special and adequate reasons for awarding a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than [one year], namely:--

(i) the fact that the accused has been convicted for the first time for an offence under this Act;

(ii) the fact that in any proceeding under this Act, other than a prosecution, the accused has been ordered to pay a penalty or the goods which are the subject matter of such proceedings have been ordered to be confiscated or any other action has been taken against him for the same act which constitutes the offence;

(iii) the fact that the accused was not the principal offender and was acting merely as a carrier of goods or otherwise was a secondary party to the commission of the offence;

(iv) the age of the accused.]

[Explanation.--For the purposes of this section, the expression "instrument" shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in the Explanation 1 to section 28AAA.]

Where this provision sits

ActThe Customs Act, 1962
Section135
Marginal noteEvasion of duty or prohibitions.
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source
Judgments citing it24

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • substituted, Act 22 of 2007. . Subs. by Act 22 of 2007, s. 112, for sub-section (1) (w.e.f. 11-5-2007).
  • substituted, Act 23 of 2019. . Subs. by Act 23 of 2019, s. 79, for "export of goods" (w.e.f. 1-8-2019).
  • inserted. . Ins. by s. 79, ibid. (w.e.f. 1-8-2019).
  • substituted, Act 17 of 2013. . Subs. by Act 17 of 2013, s. 78, for "thirty lakh" (w.e.f. 10-5-2013).
  • substituted, Act 17 of 2013. . Subs. by Act 17 of 2013, s. 78, for "thirty lakh" (w.e.f. 10-5-2013).
  • substituted, Act 23 of 2019. . Subs. by Act 23 of 2019, s. 79, for "of rupees," (w.e.f. 1-8-2019).
  • inserted. . Ins. by s. 79, ibid. (w.e.f. 1-8-2019).
  • inserted, Act 36 of 1973. . Ins. by Act 36 of 1973, s. 5 (w.e.f. 1-9-1973).
  • substituted, Act 25 of 1978. . Subs. by Act 25 of 1978, s. 16, for "six months" (w.e.f. 1-7-1978).

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Customs Act, 1962 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.