CourtMesh

Section 88

(Employees' Service) Regulations, 2001 Last amended on May 08, 2019Central Regulations · 1992

(1) An employee may appeal against an order imposing upon him any of the penalties specified in Regulation 79 or order of suspension under Regulation 86. The appeal shall lie to the Appellate Authority.

Note : For the purpose of this regulation "Appellate Authority" means the Board, in case the Chairman is the competent authority; Chairman or whole- time member of the Board, in case the Executive Director is the competent authority and Executive Director concerned in all other cases.

(2) Every appeal shall comply with the following requirements:

(a) it shall be written in Hindi or English or if not written in Hindi be accompanied by a translated copy in Hindi and shall be signed.

(b) it shall be couched in polite and respectful language and shall be free from unnecessary padding or superfluous verbiage.

(c) it shall contain all material statements and arguments relied on and shall be complete in itself.

(d) it shall specify the relief desired.

(3) An appeal shall be preferred to the appellate authority within 45 days from the date of receipt of the order appealed against. The Appellate Authority shall consider whether the findings are justified or whether the penalty is excessive or inadequate and pass appropriate orders. The Appellate Authority may pass an order confirming, enhancing, reducing or setting aside the penalty or remitting the case to the authority which imposed the penalty or to any other authority with such direction as it may deem fit in the circumstances of the case

Provided that—

(i) if the enhanced penalty which the Appellate Authority proposed to impose is a major penalty specified in Regulation 79 (2) and an inquiry as provided in regulation 80 has not already been held in the case, the Appellate Authority shall direct that such an inquiry be held in accordance with the provisions of regulation 80 and thereafter consider the record of the inquiry and pass such orders as it may deem proper.

(ii) if the Appellate Authority decides to enhance the punishment but an inquiry has already been held as provided in regulation 80, the Appellate Authority shall give a show cause notice to the employee as to why the enhanced penalty should not be imposed upon him and shall pass final order after taking into account the representation, if any, submitted by the employee.

CHAPTER VII MISCELLANEOUS Medical aid facilities

Where this provision sits

Act(Employees' Service) Regulations, 2001 Last amended on May 08, 2019
Section88
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? (Employees' Service) Regulations, 2001 Last amended on May 08, 2019 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.