CourtMesh

Section 10: Receipt in evidence of exhibits, depositions and other documents and authentication thereof.

The Extradition Act, 1962Central Act · Act 34 of 1962

(1) In any proceedings against a fugitive criminal of a foreign State * * * under this chapter, exhibits and depositions (whether received or taken in the presence of the person against whom they are used or not) and copies thereof and official certificates of facts and judicial documents stating facts may, if duly authenticated, be received as evidence.

(2) Warrants, depositions or statements on oath, which purport to have been issued or taken by any court of Justice outside India or copies thereof, certificates of, or judicial documents stating the facts of conviction before any such court shall be deemed to be duly authenticated if--

(a) the warrant purports to be signed by a judge, magistrate or officer of the State * * * where the same was issued or acting in or of such State * * *;

(b) the depositions of statements or copies thereof purport to be certified, under the hand of a judge, magistrate or officer of the State * * * where the same were taken, or acting in or for such State * * *, to be original depositions or statements or to be true copies thereof, as the case may require ;

(c) the certificate of, or judicial document stating the fact of, a conviction purports to be certified by a judge, magistrate or officer of the State * * * where the conviction took place or acting in or for such State ;

(d) the warrants, depositions, statements, copies, certificates and judicial documents, as the case may be, are authenticated by the oath of some witness or by the official seal of a Minister of the State * * * where the same were * * * issued, taken or given.

Where this provision sits

ActThe Extradition Act, 1962
Section10
Marginal noteReceipt in evidence of exhibits, depositions and other documents and authentication thereof.
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • omitted, Act 66 of 1993. . The words "or commonwealth country" omitted by Act 66 of 1993, s. 3 (w.e.f. 18-12-1993).
  • omitted, Act 66 of 1993. . The words "or country" omitted by Act 66 of 1993, s. 3 (w.e.f. 18-12-1993).
  • omitted. . The word "respectively" omitted by s. 7, ibid. (w.e.f. 18-12-1993).

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Extradition Act, 1962 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.