CourtMesh

Section 15

The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Ordinance, 1992Ordinance · 1992

(1) Any person aggrieved by any decision or order made by the Adjudicating Authority under this Ordinance may prefer an appeal,—

(a) where the decision or order has been made by the Direetatf General, to the Central Government;

Penaltr or confiscation not to interfere with ether puniskments.

Adjudicating Authority.

Giving ef opportunity t0 the awner of the goods, etc.

Appeal.

it THE GAZFiTt-: Oi' INDIA HX ntAORDLNARY [PART l i -

(b) where the decision or order has been made by an officer subordinate to the Director General, to the Director General or to any officer superior to the Adjudicating Authority authorised by the Director General to hear the appeal.

within a period of forty-five days trom the date on which the decision or order is served on such person:

Provided that the Appellate Authority may, if it is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the appeal within the aforesaid period, allow such appeal to be preferred within a further period of thirty days:

Provided further that in the case of an appeal against a decision or order imposing a penalty or redemption charges, no auch appeal shall be entertained unless the amount of the penalty or redemption charges has been deposited by the appi/lant:

Provided also that, where the Appellate Authority is of opinion that the deposit to be made will cause undue hardship to the appellant, it may, at its discretion, dispense with such deposit either unconditionally or subject to such conditions as it may impose.

(2) The Appellate Authority may, after giving to the appellant a reasonable opportunity of being heard, if he so desires, and after making such further enquiries, if any, as it may consider necessary f make such orders as it thinks fit, confirming, modifying or reversing the decision or order appealed against, or may send back thv: case with such directions, as it may think fit, for a fresh adjudication or decision, as the case may be, after taking additional evidence, if necessary:

Provided that an order enhancing or imposing a penalty or redemption charges or confiscating goods of a greater value shall not be made under this section unless the appellant has been given an opportunity of making a representation, and, if he so desires, of being heard in his defence.

(3) The order made in app»«l hj the Appellate Authority shall be final.

16. The Central Government, in the case of any decision or order, not being a decision or order made in an appeal, made by the Director General, or the Director General in the case of any decision or order made by any officer subordinate to him, may on its or his own motion or otherwise, call for and examine the records of any proceeding in which a decision or an order imposing a penalty or redemption charges or adjudicating confiscation has been made and against which no appeal has been preferred, for the purpose of satisfying itself or himself, as the case may be, as to the correctness, legality or propriety of such decision or order and make such orders thereon as may be deemed fit;

Provided that no decision or order shall be varied under this section so as to prejudicially affect any person unless such person—

(a) has, within a period of two years from the date of such decision or order, received a notice to show cause why such decision or order shall not b« varied, md R«jrt*M».

SBC 1] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY 7

(6) has been given a reasonable opportunity of making representation and, if he so desires, of being heard in his defence-

Where this provision sits

ActThe Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Ordinance, 1992
Section15
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Ordinance, 1992 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.