CourtMesh

Section 8: Reference to two or more Judges

the High Court (Hearing of Writ Petitions by Division Bench and Abolition of Letter Patent Appeals Rules, 2014State Rules of Goa · 2013

If it shall appear to any Judge, either on the application of a party or otherwise, that an appeal or matter can be more advantageously heard by a Bench of two or more Judges, he may report to that effect to the Chief Justice who shall make such order thereon as he shall think fit.

(B) Substitute the following for the existing Chapter XVII Rules, 1, 4, 17 and 18 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 (Reprint 1981):— Chapter XVII Petitions under Articles 226 and 227 and applications under Article 228 of the Constitution and Rules for the issue of writs and orders under the said Articles

1. (i) Applications for issue or writs, directions, etc. under Article 226 of the Constitution.— Every application for the issue of a direction, order or writ under Article 226 of the Constitution shall be heard and disposed of by a Division Bench to be appointed by the Chief Justice. The application shall set out therein the relief sought and the grounds on which it is sought. It shall be solemnly affirmed or supported by an affidavit. In every such application, the applicant shall state whether he has made any other application to the Supreme Court or the High Court in respect of the same matter and how that application has been disposed of.

(ii) Applicant to inform Court, if, during pendency of an application, the Supreme Court has been approached.— If the applicant makes an application to the Supreme Court in respect of the same matter during the pendency of the application in the High Court, he shall forthwith bring this fact to the notice of the High Court by filing an affidavit in the case and shall furnish a copy of such affidavit to the other side.

-5-

(iii) Hearing may be adjourned pending decision be Supreme Court.— The Court may adjourn the hearing of the application made to it pending the decision of the Supreme Court in the matter.

4. Division Bench to dispose of the application; rule nisi may be granted by a Single Judge.— Applications under Rule I shall be heard and disposed of by a Division Bench; but a Single Judge may grant rule nisi, provided that he shall not pass any final order on the application.

Where this provision sits

Actthe High Court (Hearing of Writ Petitions by Division Bench and Abolition of Letter Patent Appeals Rules, 2014
Section8
Marginal noteReference to two or more Judges
JurisdictionState of Goa
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? the High Court (Hearing of Writ Petitions by Division Bench and Abolition of Letter Paten… is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.