CourtMesh

Section 12: Suspension of recognition

Hallmarking Regulations 2018Central Regulations · 2016

(1) If, at any time, there is difficulty in assaying and hallmarking of the precious metal articles or in the event of test equipment getting out of order or due to natural calamities or a lock out declared by the management; or directed by a competent court or statutory authority, the assaying and hallmarking centre shall inform it to the Bureau immediately.

(2) As soon as the events which caused the suspension have been removed, the intimation of revocation of the suspension of operations shall be sent to the Bureau immediately.

(3) If, at any time, the Bureau has sufficient evidence that the assaying and hallmarking may not be conforming to the Indian Standard, the assaying and hallmarking centre shall be directed to suspend its operation and such evidence may not be limited to, but may include one or more of the following, namely:-

(i) non-conformity of hallmarked precious metal articles established after in-house or independent testing;

(ii) non-implementation of the provisionof the relevant Standard;

(iii) non-availability of testing personnel and absence of alternate arrangements;

(iv) relocation of assaying and hallmarking centre;

(v) prolonged closure of assaying and hallmarking centre for more than three months;

(vi) assaying and hallmarking on precious metal articles not included in the scope of the recognition;

(vii) non-submission of monthly or yearly statement regarding hallmarking charges collected from certified jewellers;

(viii) non-payment of marking fee to the Bureau within stipulated period.

(4) The assaying and hallmarking centre whose recognition has been placed under suspension shall inform the Bureau about the compliance of its order.

(5) On receipt of corrective actions, a special assessment, if required, may be carried out to verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions.

¹Hkkx IIIµ[k.M 4º Hkkjr dk jkti=k % vlk/kj.k 37

(6) The Bureau shall revoke the suspension after satisfying itself that the assaying and hallmarking centre -

(a) has taken necessary actions;

(b) deposited assessment fee as specified in Schedule -II; and

(c) has provided sufficient evidence to establish competence of the centre as per the relevant standard for assaying and hallmarking of precious metal articles.

Where this provision sits

ActHallmarking Regulations 2018
Section12
Marginal noteSuspension of recognition
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? Hallmarking Regulations 2018 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.