CourtMesh

Rule 10THC: Safe Harbour

The Income-tax Rules, 1962Central Act · 1962

Safe Harbour.

(1) Where an eligible assessee has entered into an eligible specified domestic transaction in any previous year relevant to an assessment year and the option exercised by the said assessee is treated to be validly exercised under rule 10THD, the transfer price declared by the assessee in respect of such transaction for that assessment year shall be accepted by the income-tax authorities, if it is in accordance with the circumstances as specified in sub-rule (2).

(2) The circumstances referred to in sub-rule (1) in respect of the eligible specified domestic transaction specified in column (2) of the Table below shall be as specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) of the said Table:—

[2

Purchase of milk or milk products referred to in clause (iv) of rule 10THB.

The price of milk or milk products is determined at a rate which is fixed on the basis of the quality of milk, namely, fat content and Solid Not Fat (SNF) content of milk; and—

(a) the said rate is irrespective of,—

(i) the quantity of milk procured;

(ii) the percentage of shares held by the members in the co-operative society;

(iii) the voting power held by the members in the society; and

(b) such prices are routinely declared by the co-operative society in a transparent manner and are available in public domain.]

(3) No comparability adjustment and allowance under the second proviso to sub-section (2) of section 92C shall be made to the transfer price declared by the eligible assessee and accepted under sub-rule (1).

(4) The provisions of sections 92D and 92E in respect of a specified domestic transaction shall apply irrespective of the fact that the assessee exercises his option for safe harbour in respect of such transaction.

Where this provision sits

ActThe Income-tax Rules, 1962
Rule10THC
Marginal noteSafe Harbour
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • substituted. Substituted for "in item (i), (ii) or (iii) of rule 10THB, as the case may be" by the IT (Second Amdt.) Rules, 2016, w.e.f. 17-2-2016.
  • inserted. Inserted by the IT (Second Amdt.) Rules, 2016, w.e.f. 17-2-2016.
  • inserted. Inserted by the IT (Nineteenth Amdt.) Rules, 2015, w.e.f. 8-12-2015.

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Income-tax Rules, 1962 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.