CourtMesh

Section 6: Grant of permission by appropriate authority

The Indian Telegraph Right of Way Rules, 2016Central Rules · 1885

(1) The appropriate authority shall examine the application with respect to the following parameters, namely:-

(a) the route planned for the proposed underground telegraph infrastructure and the possible interference, either in the establishment or maintenance of such telegraph infrastructure, with any other public infrastructure that may have been laid along the proposed route;

(b) the mode of execution;

(c) the time duration for execution of the work and the time of the day that the work is proposed to be executed;

(d) the estimation of expenses that the appropriate authority shall necessarily be put in consequence of the work proposed to be undertaken;

(e) the responsibility for restoration of any damage that the appropriate authority may necessarily be put in consequence of the work proposed to be undertaken;

(f) assessment of measures to ensure public safety and inconvenience that the public is likely to be put to in consequence of the work proposed and the measures to mitigate such inconvenience indicated by the licensee;

(g) any other matter, consistent with the provisions of the Act and these rules, connected with or relative to the establishment or maintenance of underground telegraph infrastructure, through a general or special order, by the Central Government, appropriate State Government or the appropriate local authority.

(2) The appropriate authority shall within a period not exceeding sixty days from the date of application made under rule 5-

(a) grant permission on such conditions including, but not limited to, the time, mode of execution, measures to mitigate public inconvenience or enhance public safety and payment of restoration charge, as may be specified, subject to the provisions of the Act and these rules; or

(b) reject the application for reasons to be recorded in writing:

Provided that no application shall be rejected unless the applicant licensee has been given an opportunity of being heard on the reasons for such rejection:

Provided further that the permission shall be deemed to have been granted if the appropriate authority fails to either grant permission under (a) or reject the application under (b); and the same shall be communicated in writing to the applicant not later than five working days after permission is deemed to have been granted.

10 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART II—SEC. 3(i)]

(3) Where the appropriate authority accepts the undertaking by the licensee to discharge the responsibility to restore the damage that such appropriate authority shall necessarily be put in consequence of the work, the appropriate authority, while granting permission under clause (a) of sub-rule (2), may seek a bank guarantee for an amount in lieu of expenses for restoration of such damage, as security for performance in the discharge of the responsibility.

(4) The appropriate authority shall not charge any fee other than those prescribed under sub-rule (3) of rule 5 and clause (a) of sub-rule (2) from the licensee for establishing underground telegraph infrastructure.

Where this provision sits

ActThe Indian Telegraph Right of Way Rules, 2016
Section6
Marginal noteGrant of permission by appropriate authority
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Indian Telegraph Right of Way Rules, 2016 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.