CourtMesh

Section 20: Termination of service of persons, other than officers on account of misconduct

Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994Central Rules · 1992

(I) When it is proposed to terminate the service of a person subject to the Act other than an officer, he shall be given an opportunity by the authority competent to dismiss or remove him to show cause in the manner specified in sub-rule (2) against such action:

8

Provided that this sub-rule shall not apply :--

(a) where the service is terminated on the ground of conduct which has led to his conviction by a criminal court or a Force Court: or

(b) where the authority as specified in rule 17 is satisfied that, for reasons to be recorded in writing, it is not expedient or reasonably practicable to give the person concerned an opportunity of showing cause.

(2) When After considering the reports on the misconduct of the person concerned, the authority as specified in rule 17 is satisfied that the trial of such a person by the Force Court is inexpedient or impracticable, but is of the opinion, that his further retention in the service is undesirable, it shall so inform him together with all reports adverse to him and he shall be called upon to submit, in writing, his explanation and defence:

Provided that the authority as specified in rule 17 may withhold from disclosure any such report or portion thereof, if in his opinion, its disclosure is not in the interest of security of the state.

(3) The authority as specified in rule 17 after considering his explanation and defence, if any, or the judgment of the criminal court, as the case may be, may dismiss or remove him from the service.

(4) All cases of dismissal or removal, under this rule, shall be reported to the Director General.

Where this provision sits

ActIndo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994
Section20
Marginal noteTermination of service of persons, other than officers on account of misconduct
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.