CourtMesh

Section 24: Termination of service of subordinate officers by the authorities as specified in rule 17 on the grounds of unsuitability

Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994Central Rules · 1992

Where a Commanding Officer not below the rank of Commandant is satisfied that a Subordinate Officer is unsuitable to be retained in service, the subordinate officer shall be--

(a) so informed ;

(b) furnished with the particulars of all matters adverse to him ; and

(c) Called upon to urge any reasons he may wish to put forward in favour of his retention in the service:

Provided that clauses (a), (b) and (c) shall not apply, if the authority as specified in rule 17, is satisfied that for reasons to be recorded by it in writing, if is not expedient or reasonably practicable to comply with the provisions thereof :

Provided further that such competent authority may not furnish to the subordinate officer any matter adverse to him, if in his opinion, it is not in the interest of the security of the state to do so.

(2) In the event of the explanation being considered by the Commanding Officer not below the rank of Commandant unsatisfactory, the matter shall be submitted to the authority as specified in rule 17 for orders together with the subordinate officer's explanation and the recommendation of such Commanding Officer.

(3) The authority as prescribed in rule 17 after considering the report and the explanation, if any, of the subordinate officer and the recommendations of the Commanding Officer not below the rank of Commandant, may call upon the subordinate officer to retire or resign and on, his refusing to do so, the subordinate officer may be compulsorily retired or discharged from the service.

Where this provision sits

ActIndo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994
Section24
Marginal noteTermination of service of subordinate officers by the authorities as specified in rule 17 on the grounds of unsuitability
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.