Section 42: Cases which may not be tried by Force Court- Without prejudice to the provisions of subrule (1) of rule 41, an offender may not normally be claimed for trial by a Force Court

Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994Central Rules · 1992

(a) where the offence is committed by him along with any other person not subject to the Act whose identity is known; or

(b) where the offence is committed by him while on leave or during absence without leave.

CHAPTER VII INVESTIGATION AND SUMMARY DISPOSAL

Where this provision sits

Act	Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994
Section	42
Marginal note	Cases which may not be tried by Force Court- Without prejudice to the provisions of subrule (1) of rule 41, an offender may not normally be claimed for trial by a Force Court
Jurisdiction	Central
Status	In force as published by the source

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Need this as data, not as a page? Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.