CourtMesh

Section 69: Swearing or affirming of members

Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994Central Rules · 1992

As soon as the Court is constituted with the proper number of officers who are not objected to or objections in respect of whom have been overruled on oath or affirmation shall be administered to every member in presence of the accused in one of 28 the following Forms or in such other form to the same purport as the Court ascertains to be according to his religion or otherwise binding on his conscience.

FORM OF OATH I,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . swear by Almighty God that I will, well and truly, try the accused (or accused persons), before the Court, according to the evidence, and that I will, duly administer justice, in accordance with the provisions of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Act, 1992 without partiality, favour or affection; and I do further swear that I will not, on any account, at any time, whatsoever, disclose or discover, the vote or opinion of any particular member of the Court unless required to give evidence thereof by a court of law.

FORM OF AFFIRMATION I, .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . do, solemnly, sincerely and truly, declare and affirm that I will, well and truly, try the accused (or accused persons), before the Court according to the evidence, and that I will, duly administer justice in accordance with the provisions of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Act, 1992, without partiality, favour or affection; and I do further solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm that I will not, on any account, at any time, whatsoever, disclose or discover, the vote or opinion of any particular member of this Court unless required to give evidence thereof by a Court of Law.

Where this provision sits

ActIndo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994
Section69
Marginal noteSwearing or affirming of members
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.