CourtMesh

Section 72: Objection to Judge Attorney and Prosecutor

Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994Central Rules · 1992

The accused shall not be permitted to object to the Judge Attorney or the prosecutor.

30

73. Arraignment-(l) When the Court and the Judge Attorney (if any) have been sworn, the charge will be read to the accused and he shall be asked whether he pleads guilty or not guilty to the charge or charges.

(2) If there is more than one charge against the accused he shall be required to plead separately to each charge.

(3) If there is more than one change-sheet against the accused before the Court, the Court shall proceed with the charges in the first of such charge-sheets and shall announce its finding thereon and if the accused has pleaded guilty, comply with rule 80, before it arraigns him upon the charges in any subsequent charge-sheet.

Where this provision sits

ActIndo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994
Section72
Marginal noteObjection to Judge Attorney and Prosecutor
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Rule, 1994 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.