CourtMesh

Section 5: Order of the Adjudicating Officer

Information Technology (Qualification and Experience of Adjudicating Officers and Manner of Holding Enquiry) Rules, 2003.Central Rules · 2000

(a) If, upon consideration of the evidence produced before the Adjudicating Officer and other records and submissions, the Adjudicating Officer is satisfied that the person has become liable to pay damages by way of compensation or to pay penalty under any of the provisions of the Act or rules, regulations, directions or orders, the Adjudicating Officer may, by order in writing, order payment of damages by way of compensation or impose such penalty, as deemed fit.

(b)While adjudging the quantum of compensation or penalty, the Adjudicating Officer shall have due regard to the following factors, namely:

(i) the amount of gain of unfair advantage, wherever quantifiable, made as a result of the default;

(ii) the amount of loss caused to any person as a result of the default;

(iii) the repetitive nature of the default.

Where this provision sits

ActInformation Technology (Qualification and Experience of Adjudicating Officers and Manner of Holding Enquiry) Rules, 2003.
Section5
Marginal noteOrder of the Adjudicating Officer
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? Information Technology (Qualification and Experience of Adjudicating Officers and Manner… is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.