When an adjudication into a matter of contravention is pending before an Adjudicating Officer, same matter shall not be pursued before any court or Tribunal or Authority in any proceeding whatsoever and if there is already filed a report in relation to the same matter, the proceedings before such other court, Tribunal or Authority shall be deemed to be withdrawn.
Section 9: Duplicity Avoided
Information Technology (Qualification and Experience of Adjudicating Officers and Manner of Holding Enquiry) Rules, 2003.Central Rules · 2000
Where this provision sits
| Act | Information Technology (Qualification and Experience of Adjudicating Officers and Manner of Holding Enquiry) Rules, 2003. |
|---|---|
| Section | 9 |
| Marginal note | Duplicity Avoided |
| Jurisdiction | Central |
| Status | In force as published by the source |
Find the provision, not just read it
The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:
- Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
- Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
- Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
- Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you
Free account. No card. About a minute to create.
Create a free accountNeed this as data, not as a page? Information Technology (Qualification and Experience of Adjudicating Officers and Manner… is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.