CourtMesh

Section 4: Secure digital signature

Information Technology (Security Procedure) Amendment Rules, 2004Central Rules · 2000

A digital signature shall be deemed to be a secure digital signature for die pur­ poses of the Act if the following procedure has been applied to it, namely:—

(a) that the smart card or hardware token, as die case may be, with cryptograpliic module, in it, is used to create die key pair;

(b) dial the private key used to create die digital signature always remains in die smart card or hardware token as die case may be;

[MFTII—75^ 3 (i)] MTOT̂ t TT5P̂ : ggpngj 3

(c) that the hash of the content to be signed is taken from tlie host system to tlie smart card or hardware token and tlie private key is used to create tlie digital signature and tlie signed hash is returned to tlie host system;

(d) that tlie information contained in tlie smart card or hardware token, as the case may be, is solely under tlie control of the person who is purported to have created the digital signature;

(e) that tlie digita 1 signature can be verified by using tlie public key listed in tlie Digital Signature Certificate issued • to that person;

(f) that tlie standards referred to in rule 6 of tlie Information Technology (Certifying Authorities) Rules, 2000 have been complied with, in so far as they relate to the creation, storage and transmission of the digital signature:

and

(g) that tlie digital signature is linked to the electronic record in such a manner that if the electronic record was altered tlie digital signature would be inval idated. • [F,No.9(8)/2003-EC] S. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, Add! Secy.

Where this provision sits

ActInformation Technology (Security Procedure) Amendment Rules, 2004
Section4
Marginal noteSecure digital signature
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? Information Technology (Security Procedure) Amendment Rules, 2004 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.