CourtMesh

Section 8: Complaints of entry in register.

The Jammu and Kashmir Habitual Offenders (Control and Reform) Act, 1956Union territory Act of Jammu and Kashmir · Act 11 of 1956

Any person aggrieved by any entry made, or proposed to be made, in such register, either when the register is first made or subsequently, may represent to the [Commissioner of the Province] against such an entry, who shall retain such person’s name on the register, or enter it therein or erase it therefrom as he may think fit :

Provided that the [Government of the Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir] shall be competent, either on its own motion, or on an application made in this behalf by the aggrieved person to confirm, alter or rescind any order passed by the [Commissioner.]

Where this provision sits

ActThe Jammu and Kashmir Habitual Offenders (Control and Reform) Act, 1956
Section8
Marginal noteComplaints of entry in register.
JurisdictionUnion territory of Jammu and Kashmir
StatusIn force as published by the source

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • other. . Now Divisional Commissioner.
  • substituted. . Substituted by S.O. 1229 (E) dated 31.03.2020 for “Government”.

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Jammu and Kashmir Habitual Offenders (Control and Reform) Act, 1956 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.