CourtMesh

Section 45: Compensation

MP Investment Region Development and Management Rules 2016State Rules of Madhya Pradesh · 2013

(1) No compei:isation shall be claimable by . an owner f~r. any damage which he may sustain in • consequence • of the prohibition of the erection of any building.

(2) The Agency shall ·make reasonable compensation to the owner· for any damage or loss which he may sustain consequence of the inclusion of his land in a public street but in assessing such compensation, regard shall be had to the benefits accruing to that owner from the development of the land belonging to him and affected by such street.

46. Power to require, removal or alteration of work not in conformity with rules or any scheme or any other requirement.­

(1) If any building is erected or re-erected or any development of land is found in contravention of any scheme or of any building 222 (202) l=f~ ~, ~ 14 l=fril 2016 / development rules, the Building Officer without prejudice to his right to • take proceedings for a fine in respect of the contravention, may by notice require the owner either to pull down or remove the work or, if he so elects, to effect such alterations therein as may be necessary to make it comply with the said scheme or byelaws.

(2) If a building is erected or re-erected- ( a) without any sanction as required under these Rules.

(b) when sanction has been refused, or ( c) in contravention of the terms of any sanction granted, or ( d) when sanction has lapsed, the Building Officer, shall-

(i) by written notice, require the person who is erecting such building or executing such work or has erected such building or executed such work on or before such day as .

shall be specified in such notice, by a statement in writing subscribed by him or by an ·agent duly authorised by him in that behalf and addressed to the Building Officer, to show sufficient cause why such building or work shall not be removed, altered or pulled down, or;

(ii) shall require the said person on such day and at such time and place as shall be specified in such notice to attend personally or by an agent duly authorize-d by him in that behalf, and show sufficient cause why such building or work shall not be removed, altered or pulled down.

(3) If such person shall fail to show sufficient cause, to the satisfaction of the Building _Officer, why such building or work shall not be removed, altered or pulled down, the Building Officer may remove, alter or pull down the building or work and the expenses thereof shall be paid by the person.

Where this provision sits

ActMP Investment Region Development and Management Rules 2016
Section45
Marginal noteCompensation
JurisdictionState of Madhya Pradesh
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? MP Investment Region Development and Management Rules 2016 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.