Section 20: Evidence for claiming refund or renewal– The Collector may require any person or his duly authorised agent claiming a refund or renewal under Chapter V of the Act, to furnish the following as evidence

MP stamp rule 1942State Rules of Madhya Pradesh · 1899

(a) an oral deposition on oath or affirmation or to file an affidavit, setting forth the circumstances under which the claim has arisen, and may also, if he thinks fit, call for the evidence of witnesses in support of the statement set forth in any such deposition or affidavit;

(b) An affidavit from the Stamp Vendor/ Service Provider; and

(c) True copy of the concerned entry of the sale register of Stamp Vendor/ the "electronic records of the Service Provider".

Where this provision sits

Act	MP stamp rule 1942
Section	20
Marginal note	Evidence for claiming refund or renewal– The Collector may require any person or his duly authorised agent claiming a refund or renewal under Chapter V of the Act, to furnish the following as evidence
Jurisdiction	State of Madhya Pradesh
Status	In force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? MP stamp rule 1942 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.