CourtMesh

Section 3: Restriction on felling of trees.

The Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964State Act of Maharashtra · Act 34 of 1964

(1) Notwithstanding any custom, usage, or law for the time being in force, or the decree or order of a Court, or anything contained in any instrument to the contrary, no person shall fell any tree or cause such tree to be felled in any land, whether of his ownership or otherwise, except with the previous permission in writing of a [Tree Officer] duly empowered by the State Government in that behalf *.

[(1A) If any person wishes to fell a tree, he shall apply in writing to the [Tree Officer] empowered under sub-section (1) for permission in that behalf.

(1B) The [Tree Officer] on receipt of an application-

(a) shall acknowledge the application within seven days ;

(b) may, after due enquiry, either grant or refuse the permission, applied for in accordance with the provisions of rules made under section 15 :

Provided that, no such permission shall be refused if the tree is dead, diseased or windfallen, or if it has silviculturally matured, [or if it constitutes obstruction to traffic, or if it is substantially damaged or destroyed by fire, lightning, rain, or other natural causes, or if it constitutes an obstruction to efficient cultivation :

[Provided further that such permission shall be granted subject to the condition that the applicant shall plant equal number of trees of the same or any other species as the Tree Officer may direct on the same site or other suitable place in the vicinity in the ensuring planting season ;]

[(1Ba) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1B), but subject to the rules made under section 15 in this behalf, the Tree Officer shall not refuse the application made under sub-section (1A) for carrying out silvicultural operations like thinning or felling of trees scientifically for optimum growth of an artificial plantation.]

(1C) If the [Tree Officer] fails to inform that applicant of his decision within [sixty days] from the date of acknowledgement of the application, or from the date of receipt of the application, if the application is not acknowledged, the permission applied for shall be deemed to have been granted.]

(2) Any person aggrieved by an order of the [Tree Officer] refusing to grant permission under [sub-section (1B)] may, within thirty days of the receipt of such order, appeal to the Collector. Subject to such rules of procedure as may be prescribed, the Collector may, after giving such person a reasonable opportunity of being heard, pass such order on the appeal as he thinks just and proper.

Where this provision sits

ActThe Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964
Section3
Marginal noteRestriction on felling of trees.
JurisdictionState of Maharashtra
StatusIn force as published by the source

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • substituted, Mah. 26 of 1989. These words were substituted for the words "Revenue Officer" not below the rank of the "Deputy Collector" by Mah. 26 of 1989, s. 3(a).
  • omitted, Mah. 31 of 1967. The portion beginning with the words "and in accordance with the provisions of rules" and ending with the words "or if it constitutes an obstruction to efficient cultivation" was deleted by Mah. 31 of 1967, s. 2(a).
  • inserted, Mah. 31 of 1967. Clauses (1A) to (1C) were inserted by Mah. 31 of 1967, s. 2(b).
  • substituted, Mah. 26 of 1989. These words were substituted for words "Revenue Officer" by Mah. 26 of 1989, s. 3(b), (c)(i), (d) (i) and (e) (i), respectively.
  • substituted, Mah. 26 of 1989. These words were substituted for words "Revenue Officer" by Mah. 26 of 1989, s. 3(b), (c)(i), (d) (i) and (e) (i), respectively.
  • added, Mah. 26 of 1989. These words were added by Mah. 26 of 1989, s. 3 (c) (ii).
  • added, Mah. 26 of 1989. The proviso was added by Mah. 26 of 1989, s. 3(c) (iii).
  • inserted, Mah. 35 of 1999. This sub-section was inserted by Mah. 35 of 1999, s. 3.
  • substituted, Mah. 26 of 1989. These words were substituted for words "Revenue Officer" by Mah. 26 of 1989, s. 3(b), (c)(i), (d) (i) and (e) (i) respectively.
  • substituted, Mah. 26 of 1989. These words were substituted for the words "ninety days" by Mah. 26 of 1989, s. 3 (d) (ii). 11. These words were substituted for words "Revenue Officer" by Mah. 26 of 1989, s. 3(b), (c)(i), (d) (i) and (e) (i) respectively.
  • substituted, Mah. 26 of 1989. These words, brackets, figure and letter were substituted for the words, brackets and figure "sub-section (1)" by Mah. 26 of 1989, 3(e)(ii).

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Maharashtra Felling of Trees (Regulation) Act, 1964 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.