CourtMesh

Section 126: Omission by pawn-brokers, etc., to report to Police possession or tender of property suspected to be stolen.

The Maharashtra Police Act.State Act of Maharashtra · Act 22 of 1951

Whoever, being a pawn-broker, dealer in second-hand property, or worker in metals, or reasonably believed by the Commissioner, or [Superintendent], in the areas under their respective charges to be such a person, and having received from a Police officer written or printed information that the possession of any property suspected to have been transferred by any offence mentioned in section 410 of the Indian Penal Code (XLV of 1860), or by any offence punishable under sections 417, 418, 419 or 420 of the said Code, is found in possession or thereafter comes into the possession, or has an offer either by way of sale, pawn, exchange or for custody, alteration or otherwise howsoever, made to him, of property answering the description contained in such information, shall, unless-

(i) he forthwith gives information to the Commissioner, or the [Superintendent], as the case may be, or at a Police station of such possession or offer and takes all reasonable means to ascertain and to give information as aforesaid of the name and address of the person from whom the possession or offer was received, or

(ii) the property being, as an article of common wearing apparel or otherwise, incapable of identification from the written or printed information given, has been in no way concealed after the receipt of such information,

on conviction, be punished with fine which may extend to [two thousand rupees] in respect of each such article of property so in his possession or offered to him.

Where this provision sits

ActThe Maharashtra Police Act.
Section126
Marginal noteOmission by pawn-brokers, etc., to report to Police possession or tender of property suspected to be stolen.
JurisdictionState of Maharashtra
StatusIn force as published by the source

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • substituted, Mah. 46 of 1962. This word was substituted for the words "District Superintendent" by Mah. 46 of 1962, s. 3, Sch.
  • substituted, Mah. 46 of 1962. This word was substituted for the words "District Superintendent" by Mah. 46 of 1962, s. 3, Sch.
  • substituted, Mah. 40 of 2000. These words were substituted for the words "fifty rupees" by Mah. 40 of 2000, s. 23.

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Maharashtra Police Act. is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.