CourtMesh

Section 50: Refund of excess payment.

The Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002.State Act of Maharashtra · Act 9 of 2005

(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, [the Commissioner shall, by order refund] to a person the amount of [tax, penalty, interest, security deposit deposited under section 16] if any, paid by such person in excess of the amount due from him. The refund may be either by deduction of such excess from the amount of tax, penalty, amount forfeited and interest due, if any, in respect of any other period or in any other case, by cash payment :

Provided that, the Commissioner shall first apply such excess towards the recovery of any amount due in respect of which a notice under sub-section (4) of section 32 has been issued, or, as the case may be, any amount which is due as per any return or revised return but not paid and shall then refund the balance, if any.

[(2) If a registered dealer has filed any return, fresh returns or revised returns in respect of any period contained in any year and any amount if refundable to the said dealer according to the return, fresh return or revised return, then subject to rules, the dealer may adjust such refund against the amount due as per any return, fresh return or revised return for any [* * *] period contained in the said year, filed under this Act or the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (74 of 1956) or the Maharashtra Tax on the Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 2002 (Mah. IV of 2003)] :

Provided that, for the period commencing on or after the 1 April 2012, a dealer whose refund claim in a year is rupees five lakh or less, may, carry forward such refund to the return or revised return for immediate succeeding year to which such refund relates.]

Where this provision sits

ActThe Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002.
Section50
Marginal noteRefund of excess payment.
JurisdictionState of Maharashtra
StatusIn force as published by the source

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • substituted, Mah. 32 of 2006. These words were substituted for the words "the Commissioner shall refund" by Mah. 32 of 2006, s. 49(a).
  • substituted, Mah. 15 of 2011. These words were substituted for the words "tax, penalty, interest" by Mah. 15 of 2011, s. 15.
  • substituted, Mah. 32 of 2006. Sub-section (2) was substituted by Mah. 32 of 2006, s. 49(b).
  • omitted, Mah. 25 of 2007. The word "subsequent" was deleted by Mah. 25 of 2007, s. 15(2).
  • added, Mah. 8 of 2013. This proviso was added by Mah. 8 of 2013, s. 10.

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.