CourtMesh

Section 22

The Multimodal Transportation of Goods Ordinance, 1993Ordinance · 1993

(1) The multimodal transport operator who has not been paid the amount of consideration stipulated in the multimodal transport contract shall have a lien on the consignment and on the documents in his possession.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sections 13, 16 and 18, the period during which the goods arc in possession of the multimodal transport operator in exercise of his right of lien rcfcued to In sub-option (1) shall not be included for the purposes of calculating the time of delay under any of those sections.

23. Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Ordinance, it shall be lawful for the parties to the multimodal transport contract to include in the multimodal transport document any provision relating to general average.

Explanation.—For the purposes of mis section, "fatiit.idi an-iagc" means loss, damage or expense reasonably incurred in order to avert danger to property in common peril and in the common interest involved in the multimodal transportation.

Special provision for dangerous goods.

Right of multimodal transport operator to have lien \m goods and documents.

10 THE GAZETTE OF JNDlA EXTRAORDINARY IPAKT Jfc.

Limitation on action.

Jurisdiction for instituting action.

Arbitration.

Delegation of power.

Multimodal transport contract to be made in accordance with this Ordinance, Ordinance to override other enactmwits.

24. The multimodal transport operator shall not be liable under any of the provisions of this Ordinance unless action against him is brought within nine months ofc— . ^ (a ) the date of delivery-of the goods, or I ( i ) the date when the goods should have been delivered, or (c ) th£ date on and fconv which the party entitled to "deceive delivery.of-tfae goods has the right to treat the goods as lost Under subsection (2) oJ? section 13.

25. Any party to the multimodal transport contract may institute an action in a court which is competent m$ -W*hin the jurisdiction of whjch is situated one of the following places, namely:— ^ ( a ) the principal place of business, or, in the absence thereof, the habitual residence, of the" defendant; or (£) the. place where the multimodal" transport contract was made, provided that the defendant has a pJase.of business, braneiijM agg^cy *St such place; or ,.-. ._ . ,.,„„ (c ) the place of taking charge of the goods for multimodal feansportation or the place of delivery thereof; or •

(d) any other p l a c e speetfled'-in t he mul t imodal t r anspor t cont rac t and evidenced in t h e mul t imodal - t ranspor t document . :

Where this provision sits

ActThe Multimodal Transportation of Goods Ordinance, 1993
Section22
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Multimodal Transportation of Goods Ordinance, 1993 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.