CourtMesh

Notification SO 466(E) dared 6.4.2004 - Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2004

Central Notification · 20026,769 characters of text

The enactment

TypeNotification
Year2002
JurisdictionCentral
MinistryMinistry of Finance
StatusIn force as published by the source
TextPublished as one document, as the source published it
Subjectsfinancial

Full text

The source publishes this enactment as a single document rather than provision by provision, so the whole text is below and there are no per-section pages for it. Nothing has been shortened.

(1) roomscan qmmmggewgfm mmmmkmmwmmemmw61ml$hlzflt§k€

5.32%anum];9661‘m(m)m&mmmwmw @661‘memmgwmw@mw ’ I =mm$m leakaeegafilgtegymnsgummsamea‘Wmfimfikflmfi waw‘mmmwwmfiwwmmm £§Mmmahgweggyamnmgumnmmw f%w&wwm€w;nmmwmwmaswm Baaeunwmwumm‘mewmmwnm gaggigwgummgumJgemgwem(mwyggmmgm gmmmg(flmn—mgsmmgmgmleaemmww Wmmwfimfifiglll'WSthflIfii‘M—hh‘aflpklg‘a " < 1&9EEEEQEZOOZ 121mmQMLEEWAMELEWM)(vswzooz)zooz‘mgrgtehgan aaefimnwmflahmmkwi$wmw—w>eevmm P 'bOOZ‘Efim9‘Mgk mime

(mm) (WWW) manna 9m‘LIWIN‘9"muv‘Avasml12mmmm[09s'ON 9w‘LLne/voozwants‘mamm‘mgr.

‘ [09611 momv2m(Imam Emmaa.margin LII)mum-«n91“09398—11ma

(a)m—na—esum—11m “mom OWN}:.10ginpiog)27.13 més/vooee—dgh0L:“.3£33331 THE GAZETI‘EOF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART II—fic. 3(ii)] 'fimmafifimfifi um 17 flaw-arm (3) mmmafifalfilmw ...

mmnammtmmaaéafimaumm)mmfiwfimls fifimufiafi éfifmfififiwmfifilfimmfifiafijafifiaq,.l993‘ ' filmsfimuW-mmfiafimmfifimafilm warm m<mmwafilfiammwbfimwmt firmmafilfimfimmfim—mufififiamfilfimw hwéfimmmmfiwmmm,ww%l Wfiumfifiwmafiafiafifim 1993 WMWWmmfilm mmwml .

wmwwmmwmmfimmfim 1993 33 mwmwaafimm<mmm 199433W833Wqfifi Wmfimfilmzofiflmfimafilmfimwmmmmmw WWWW%;

.

.

mmwmxmmmtmfiafiwmm fifimmfirfifiafilfim 1993 is alwfamlfifimlawafilfiwm mfimfiwfimfiwwmlsmmmmfi*fifi3fi mkmfifimmfiél $32,313 3am memfimmnmmfifiafimm mammmmfigmmmmmfimfimnm 9‘ Ismammwmasmwmmmmfimmm W%,firafifimm3mzfiéamfifitw,mz

1. Wmfimy:

(i) wmawmwmwmmmmmw (WWW) elm, 2004 WW I

(ii) fimmfifil '

2. M:WWW(W)W,1993%W WWW mfimmmfimq 1993 filmfifimfimufiaaaafia ‘ waféaamfifiafimmmagfiafimwmmm 1993 il% l

3. mafimfimmwmmmm: WW3;

WmeWfiammmfiafiszafiWNfimm amazemafifilafimwfimwwfimmfimm'mafimw <m>m,1993:m7$mmmmmfimmmaamv wwwqfiafi WWI [mu—m3(fi)l WWW : mm 3

4. wmmamammwmeMaw earn *’ mamwwiarm Wfinnmarfiifim 200%le 18 fim-W(1)%anfifimawmafiwfiafiawm$mw mammarfiw<m>fim 1994vemttseainfinawa§rfi mmamwmemwwmmammr [rat a. 4/1/2oo4~fi.§fi.—I] m not, “ti-gar! afar:

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DepartmaltafEconanicAfiairs) (BANKING DIVISION) ORDER NewDelhi, the 6th April, 2004

8.0. 466(E).——Whereasthe Securitisalion andReconstruction ofFinancialAssets and Enforcement ofSec.

' “est Act, 2002 (54 of 2002) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act came into force on the 18th day 0. nber, 2002;

- And wn as any personr(including borrower), aggrieved by any of the measures referred to in sub-section (4) if section 13 of the said Act taken by the secured creditor or his authorised officer under Chapter III of the said Act, may prefer an appeal under sub-section (1) of section 17 of the said Act to the Debts Recovery Tribunal established under sub-section (1) of section '3 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 having jurisdiction in the matter;

And whereas the provisions contained in sub-section (3) of section 17 of the said Act provides that the Debts Recovery Tribunal shall, as far as may be, dispose of an appeal arising with the said Act in accordance with the provisions of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (51 of 1993) and rules made thereunder;

And whereas section 19 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, read with rule 7 of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993 made under that Act, specifies the fee for the purpose of filing an application to the Debts Recovery Tribunal under the Act;

And whereas any person (including borrower), aggrieved by any order made by the Debts Recovery Tribunal under sub-section (3) of section 17 of the said Act may prefer an appeal under sub-section (1) of section 18 of the said Act to the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal referred to under sub-section (1) of section 8 ofthe Recovery ofDebts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the Appellate Tribunal) having jurisdiction in the matter;

And whereas the provisions contained in sub-section (2) of section 18 of the said Act provides that the Appellate Tribunal shall, as far as may be, dispose of an appeal arising with the said Act in accordance with the provisions of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 and rules made thereunder;

THE GAZETTEOF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART 11—836. 39)] Amhereas section 20 of the Recovery of‘Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, read with rule (8 of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1994 made under that Act, specifies the fee for the purpose of filing of an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal;

.

And whereas in the absence of express provisions to levy fees, difficulties have arisen in the matter of levying of fees for filing of appeals under section 17 and 18 of the said Act to the Debts Recovery Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal established under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 40 of the said Act, the Central Government hereby makes the following Order to makethe provisions for levying of the fee for filing of appeals under sections 17 and 18 of the said Act, being not inconsistent with the provisions of the Act, to remove the difficulty, namely:-

1. Short title and commencement.-

(i) This Order may be called the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (Removal ofDifficulties) Order, 2004.

(ii) It shall come into force at once.

' ' _

2. Definition;— Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure)Rules, 1993 means the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993 made under section 9 read with clause (e) of sub-section (2) of section 36 of the Recovery ofDebts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

3. Fee for filing of an appeal to Debts Recovery Tribunal.— The fee for filing of an appeal to the Debts Recovery Tribunal under sub-section (1) of section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 shall be mutatis mutandis as provided for filing of an application to the Debts Recovery Tribunal under rule; of Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993.

V

4. Fee for filing of an appeal to Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal.- The fee for filing of an appeal to the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal under sub-section (1) of section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 shall be mutatis mutandis as provided for filing of an appeal to the DebtsrRecovery Appellate Tribunal under rule 8 of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1994.

[F.No. 4/1/2004—Bo-Il AMITABH VIEWA,n. Secy.

Printed by the Manager, Govt. of India Press, Ring Road, Maynpuri, New Delhi-110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.

\ 5N

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? Notification SO 466(E) dared 6.4.2004 - Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial As… is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.