CourtMesh

Section 113: Certificate of validity of specification and costs of subsequent suits for infringement thereof.

The Patents Act, 1970Central Act · Act 39 of 1970

[(1) If in any proceedings before *** a High Court for the revocation of a patent under section 64 and section 104, *** the validity of any claim of a specification is contested and that claim is found by *** the High Court to be valid, *** the High Court may certify that the validity of that claim was contested in those proceedings and was upheld.]

(2) Where any such certificate has been granted, then, if in any subsequent suit before a court for infringement of that claim of the patent or in any subsequent proceeding for revocation of the patent in so far as it relates to that claim, the patentee or other person relying on the validity of the claim obtains a final order or judgment in his favour, he shall be entitled to an order for the payment of his full costs, charges and expenses of an incidental to any such suit or proceeding properly incurred so far as they concern the claim in respect of which the certificate was granted, unless the court trying the suit or proceeding otherwise directs:

Provided that the costs as specified in this sub-section shall not be ordered when the party disputing the validity of the claim satisfies the court that he was not aware of the grant of the certificate when he raised the dispute and withdrew forthwith such defence when he became aware of such a certificate.

[(3) Nothing contained in this section shall be construed as authorising the courts *** hearing appeals from decrees or orders in suits for infringement or petitions for revocation, as the case may be, to pass orders for costs on the scale referred to therein.]

Where this provision sits

ActThe Patents Act, 1970
Section113
Marginal noteCertificate of validity of specification and costs of subsequent suits for infringement thereof.
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • substituted, Act 15 of 2005. . Subs. by Act 15 of 2005, s. 59, for sub-section (1) (w.e.f. 2-4-2007).
  • omitted, Act 33 of 2021. . The words “the Appellate Board or” omitted by Act 33 of 2021, s. 13 (w.e.f. 4-4-2021).
  • omitted. . The words “as the case may be” omitted by s. 13, ibid. (w.e.f. 4-4-2021).
  • substituted. . Subs. by s. 59, ibid., for sub-section (3) (w.e.f. 2-4-2007).

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Patents Act, 1970 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.