CourtMesh

Section 9A: Presumptions as to offences under sections 3, 3A and 4.

The Suppression of Unlawful Acts against Safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982Central Act · Act 66 of 1982

[9A. Presumptions as to offences under sections 3, 3A and 4.-- In a prosecution for an offence under sections 3, 3A and 4, if it is proved--

(a) that the arms, ammunition or explosives were recovered from the possession of the accused and there is reason to believe that such arms, ammunition or explosives of similar nature were used in the commission of such offence; or

(b) that there is evidence of violence committed by the accused against any person in connection with the commission of such offence,

the Designated Court shall presume, unless the contrary is proved that the accused had committed such offence.]

Where this provision sits

ActThe Suppression of Unlawful Acts against Safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982
Section9A
Marginal notePresumptions as to offences under sections 3, 3A and 4.
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • inserted, Act 40 of 1994. . Ins. by Act 40 of 1994, s. 6 (w.e.f. 19-9-1996).

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Suppression of Unlawful Acts against Safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.