CourtMesh

Section 15: Special provisions relating to masters and seamen

The Employee’s Compensation Act,1923(CENTRAL ACT)State Act of Tamil Nadu · Act 8 of 1923

This Act shall apply in the case of 4[employees] who are masters of 5*** ships or seamen subject to the following modifications namely:—

(1) The notice of the accident and the claim for compensation may, except where the person injured is the master of the ship, be served on the master of the ship as if he were the employer, but where the accident happened and the disablement commenced on board the ship it shall not be necessary for any seaman to give any notice of the accident.

1. Subs. by Act 45 of 2009, s. 5, for “workman” (w.e.f.18-1-2010).

2. Subs. by Act 30 of 1995, s. 7, for certain words (w.e.f.15-9-1995).

3. Ins. by Act 8 of 1959, s. 10 (w.e.f.1-6-1959).

4. Subs. by Act 45 of 2009, s. 5, for “workmen” (w.e.f.18-1-2010).

5. The word “registered” omitted by Act 15 of 1933, s. 10.

18

(2) In the case of the death of a master or seaman, the claim for compensation shall be made within 1 [one year] after the news of the death has been received by the claimant or, where the ship has been or is deemed to have been lost with all hands, within eighteen months of the date on which the ship was, or is deemed to have been, so lost:

2 [Provided that the Commissioner may entertain any claim to compensation in any case notwithstanding that the claim has not been preferred in due time as provided in this sub-section, if he is satisfied that the failure so to prefer the claim was due to sufficient cause.]

(3) Where an injured master or seaman is discharged or left behind in any part of 3[India or] 4[in any foreign country] any depositions taken by any Judge or Magistrate in that part or by any Consular Officer in the foreign country and transmitted by the person by whom they are taken to the Central Government or any State Government shall, in any proceedings for enforcing the claim, be admissible in evidence—

(a) if the deposition is authenticated by the signature of the Judge, Magistrate or Consular Officer before whom it is made;

(b) if the defendant or the person accused, as the case may be, had an opportunity by himself or his agent to cross-examine the witness; and

(c) if the deposition was made in the course of a criminal proceeding, on proof that the deposition was made in the presence of the person accused;

and it shall not be necessary in any case to prove the signature or official character of the person appearing to have signed any such deposition and a certificate by such person that the defendant or the person accused had an opportunity of cross-examining the witness and that the deposition if made in a criminal proceeding was made in the presence of the person accused shall, unless the contrary is proved, be sufficient evidence that he., had that opportunity and that it was so made.

5 * * * * * 6 [(4)] No 7 [half-monthly payment] shall be payable in respect of the period during which the owner of the ship is, under any law in force for the time being 8 *** relating to merchant shipping, liable to defray the expenses of maintenance of the injured master or seaman.

9 [(5) No compensation shall be payable under this Act in respect of any injury in respect of which provision is made for payment of a gratuity, allowance or pension under the War Pensions and Detention Allowances (Mercantile Marine, etc.) Scheme, 1939, or the War Pensions and Detention Allowances (Indian Seamen, etc.) Scheme, 1941, made under the Pensions (Navy, Army, Air Force and Mercantile Marine) Act, 1939 (2 & 3 Geo.), or under the War Pensions and Detention Allowances (Indian Seamen) Scheme, 1942 (6, c. 83), made by the Central Government.

(6) Failure to give a notice or make a claim or commence proceedings within the time required by this Act shall not be a bar to the maintenance of proceedings under this Act in respect of any personal injury, if—

1. Subs. by Act 8 of 1959, s. 11, for “six months” (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).

2. Added by s. 11, ibid. (w.e.f. 1-6-1959).

3. Ins. by the A.O. 1950.

4. Subs. by Act 22 of 1984, s. 4, for certain words (w.e.f. 1-7-1984).

5. Clause (4) omitted by Act 9 of 1938, s. 7.

6. Clause (5) renumbered as clause (4) of that section by s. 7, ibid.

7. Subs. by Act 7 of 1924, s. 2 and the First Schedule, for “monthly payment”.

8. The words “in Part A States and Part C States” omitted by Act 3 of 1951, s. 3, and the Schedule.

9. Subs. by Act 1 of 1942, s. 2 (w.e.f. 3-9-1939).

19

(a) an application has been made for payment in respect of that injury under any of the schemes referred to in the preceding clause, and

(b) the State Government certifies that the said application was made in the reasonable belief that the injury was one in respect of which the scheme under which the application was made makes provision for payments, and that the application was rejected or that payments made in pursuance of the application were discontinued on the ground that the injury was not such an injury, and

(c) the proceedings under this Act are commenced within one month from the date on which the said certificate of the State Government was furnished to the person commencing the proceedings.]

1 [15A. Special provisions relating to captains and other members of crew of aircrafts.—This Act shall apply in the case of 2 [employees] who are captains or other members of the crew of aircrafts subject to the following modifications, namely:—

(1) The notice of the accident and the claim for compensation may, except where the person injured is the captain of the aircraft, be served on the captain of the aircraft as if he were the employer, but where the accident happened and the disablement commenced on board the aircraft it shall not be necessary for any member of the crew to give notice of the accident.

(2) In the case of the death of the captain or other member of the crew, the claim for compensation shall be made within one year after the news of the death has been received by the claimant or, where the aircraft has been or is deemed to have been lost with all hands, within eighteen months of the date on which the aircraft was, or is deemed to have been, so lost:

Provided that the Commissioner may entertain any claim for compensation in any case notwithstanding that the claim has not been preferred in due time as provided in this sub-section, if he is satisfied that the failure so to prefer the claim was due to sufficient cause.

(3) Where an injured captain or other member of the crew of the aircraft is discharged or left behind in any part of India or in any other country, any depositions taken by any Judge or Magistrate in that part or by any Consular Officer in the foreign country and transmitted by the person by whom they are taken to the Central Government or any State Government shall, in any proceedings for enforcing the claims, be admissible in evidence—

(a) if the deposition is authenticated by the signature of the Judge, Magistrate or Consular Officer before whom it is made;

(b) if the defendant or the person accused, as the case may be, had an opportunity by himself or his agent to cross-examine the witness;

(c) if the deposition was made in the course of a criminal proceeding, on proof that the deposition was made in the presence of the person accused, and it shall not be necessary in any case to prove the signature or official character of the person appearing to have signed any such deposition and a certificate by such person that the defendant or the person accused had an opportunity of cross-examining the witness and that the deposition if made in a criminal proceedings was made in the presence of the person accused shall, unless the contrary is proved, be sufficient evidence that he had that opportunity and that it was so made.

Where this provision sits

ActThe Employee’s Compensation Act,1923(CENTRAL ACT)
Section15
Marginal noteSpecial provisions relating to masters and seamen
JurisdictionState of Tamil Nadu
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Employee’s Compensation Act,1923(CENTRAL ACT) is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.