CourtMesh

Section 52D: Decision by majority

Information Technology Act, 2000 (Central Act 21 of 2000)State Act of Tamil Nadu · Act 21 of 2000

If the Members of a Bench consisting of two Members differ in opinion on any point, they shall state the point or points on which they differ, and make a reference to the Chairperson of the 2 [Appellate Tribunal] who shall hear the point or points himself and such point or points shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the Members who have heard the case, including those who first heard it.]

53. [Filling up of vacancies.] Omitted by the Finance Act, 2017 (7 of 2017), s. 169 (w.e.f. 26-5-2017).

54. [Resignation and removal.] Omitted by s. 169, ibid. (w.e.f. 26-5-2017).

Where this provision sits

ActInformation Technology Act, 2000 (Central Act 21 of 2000)
Section52D
Marginal noteDecision by majority
JurisdictionState of Tamil Nadu
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? Information Technology Act, 2000 (Central Act 21 of 2000) is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.