CourtMesh

Section 12: Interpretation of rules

State Board for Wildlife Rules, 2014State Rules of Tamil Nadu · 1972

Where any doubt arise as to the interpretation of these rules, interpretation shall be referred to the State Government for its opinion and decision.

HANS RAJ VERMA, Principal Secretary to Gover n ment.

82 TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT GAZETTE [Part III—Sec. 1(a) PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT Secretariat, 12th November 2014.

Provision of unexpected contingencies.

No. SRO A-31/2014.

[Public Services-Preparation of panel for promotion and recruitment by transfer Estimate of vacancies-Provision of unexpected contingencies-Percentage reduced-Orders-Issued.]

The following Government Order is published:— [G.O. Ms. No. 103, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (S), 9th October 2104, ¹ó†ì£C 23, üò, ÂUtŸSt® M©L-2045.]

READ :

1. G.O.(Ms). No. 770, Public (Services-A) Department, dated 06-03-1974.

2. G.O.(Ms). No. 795, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Per.M) Department, dated 16-08-1982.

3. G.O.(Ms). No. 906, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Per.S) Department, dated 16-09-1986.

4. G.O.(Ms). No. 381, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (Per.S) Department, dated 28-06-1989.

ORDER : No. 103, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (S), 9th October 2014.

In the Government Orders first, second and third read above, a percentage of the anticipated vacancies towards unexpected contingencies has been introduced. In continuation of this, the percentage of anticipated vacancies towards the provision for unexpected contingencies has been fixed on a staggered scale in the Government Order fourth read above.

2. The Government examined in detail, that the staggered scale allowed for unexpected contingencies is unduly large in several cases and gives much hardship and difficulties while drawing panel. The Government have decided that the percentage indicated in the provision for unexpected contingencies being followed at present may be reduced by 10%.

3. The Government accordingly direct that the provision for unexpected contingencies while estimating the vacancies for the formulation of panel for appointment by promotion or by recruitment by transfer or both be fixed as follows:— When the total vacancies Provision for unexpected arrived at with reference to contingencies as a percentage General Rule 4 are between. of total vacancies.

(1) (2) 1 and 10 40 % 11 and 20 30 % 21 and 40 20 % 41 and 100 15 % Above 100 10 % (By Order of the Governor.)

P.W.C. DAVIDAR, Principal Secretary to Gover n ment.

PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE DIRECTOR OF STATIONERY AND PRINTING, CHENNAI ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU

Where this provision sits

ActState Board for Wildlife Rules, 2014
Section12
Marginal noteInterpretation of rules
JurisdictionState of Tamil Nadu
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? State Board for Wildlife Rules, 2014 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.