CourtMesh

Section 59: Appeal to the High Court

Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006State Act of Tamil Nadu · Act 32 of 2006

(1)Any person objecting to an order passed by the 1{Additional} Commissioner under section 55 may, within a period of ninety days from the date on which the order was served on him, appeal against such order to the High Court.

(2) The appeal shall be in the prescribed form and shall be verified in the prescribed manner.

(3) In disposing of an appeal, the High Court may, after giving the appellant a reasonable opportunity of being heard,--

(a) in the case of an order of assessment--

(i) confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment or penalty or both; or

(ii) set aside the assessment and direct the assessing authority to make a fresh assessment after such further inquiry as may be directed; or

(iii) pass such order as it may think fit; or

(b) in the case of any other order, confirm, cancel or vary such order:

Provided that at the hearing of any appeal, the assessing authority shall have the right to be heard either in person or by a representative.

(4) Every order passed in appeal under this section shall be final.

(5) Notwithstanding that an appeal has been preferred under sub-section (1), the tax shall be paid in accordance with the order of assessment against which the appeal has been preferred:

Provided that the High Court may, in its discretion, give such directions as it thinks fit, in regard to the payment of the tax before the disposal of the appeal, if the appellant furnishes sufficient security to its satisfaction, in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed.

(6) (a) The appellant or respondent may apply for review of any order passed by the High Court under sub-section (3) on the basis of the discovery of new and important facts which after the exercise of due diligence were not within his knowledge or could not be produced by him when the order was made.

______________________ 1 Substituted by Tamil Nadu Amendment Act 18 of 2009, with effect from 30th July 2008

(b) The application for review shall be preferred within such time, and in such manner as may be prescribed, and shall, where it is preferred by the assessee, be accompanied by such fee as may be prescribed.

60. Revision by the High Court (1) Within ninety days from the date on which the order under sub-sections (4), (5) or (7) of section 58 is served, any person who objects to such order or the 1[Joint] Commissioner may prefer a petition to the High Court on the ground that the Appellate Tribunal has either decided erroneously or failed to decide any question of law:

Provided that the High Court may, within a further period of ninety days, admit a petition preferred after the expiration of the first mentioned period of ninety days aforesaid if it is satisfied, that the petitioner had sufficient cause for not preferring the petition within the first mentioned period.

(2) The petition shall be in the prescribed form, shall be verified in the prescribed manner, and shall, where it is preferred by any party other than the 1[Joint] Commissioner, be accompanied by such fee as may be prescribed.

(3) If the High Court, on perusing the petition, considers that there is no sufficient ground for interfering, it may dismiss the petition summarily:

Provided that no petition shall be dismissed unless the petitioner has had a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

(4) (a) If the High Court does not dismiss the petition summarily, it shall, after giving both the parties to the petition a reasonable opportunity of being heard, determine the question of law raised and either reverse, affirm or amend the order against which the petition was preferred or remit the matter to the Appellate Tribunal, with the opinion of the High Court on the question of law raised or pass such order in relation to the matter as the High Court thinks fit.

(b) Where the High Court remits the matter under clause (a) with its opinion on the question of law raised, the Appellate Tribunal shall amend the order passed by it in conformity with such opinion.

(5) Before passing an order under sub-section (4), the High Court may, if it considers it necessary so to do, remit the petition to the Appellate Tribunal, and direct it to return the petition with its finding on any specific question or issue.

(6) Notwithstanding that a petition has been preferred under sub-section (1), the tax shall be paid in accordance with the order against which the revision has been preferred.

(7) (a) The petitioner or the respondent may apply for review of any order passed by the High Court under clause (a) of sub-section (4) on the basis of the discovery of new and important facts which after the exercise of due diligence were not within his knowledge or could not be produced by him when the order was made.

_________________________ 1 Substituted by Tamil Nadu Amendment Act 18 of 2009, with effect from 30th July 2008 .

(b) The application for review shall be preferred within such time, and in such manner as may be prescribed, and shall, where it is preferred by any party other than the Deputy Commissioner, be accompanied by such fee as may be prescribed.

(8) In respect of every petition or application preferred under sub-section (1), or clause (a) of sub-section (7), respectively, the costs shall be in the discretion of the High Court.

.

.

Where this provision sits

ActTamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006
Section59
Marginal noteAppeal to the High Court
JurisdictionState of Tamil Nadu
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.