CourtMesh

Section 68: Vigilance cases

The Unique Identification Authority of India (Salary, Allowances and other Terms and Conditions of Service of Employees) Regulations, 2020Central Regulations · 2016

Notwithstanding anything contained in regulations 60 to 67 or any other regulation, the following additional provisions shall apply where it is alleged that an employee has been guilty of corrupt practices, namely:

(a) Where it is alleged that an employee is possessed of disproportionate assets or that he has committed an act of criminal misconduct or where the investigation and proof of the allegation would require the evidence of persons who are not employees of the Authority or where, in the opinion of the Disciplinary Authority, the investigation into the allegations may, with the approval of the Competent Authority, be trusted to the Central Bureau of Investigation or the Central Vigilance Commission or any other such agency as may be approved by the Competent Authority.

(b) If after considering the report of the investigation, the Disciplinary Authority is satisfied that there is a prima facie case for instituting disciplinary proceedings against the employee, it may send the investigation report to the Central Vigilance Commission or such other authority as may be decided by the Competent Authority from time to time in this behalf, for its advice whether disciplinary proceedings should be taken against the employee concerned.

(c) If after considering the advice of the Central Vigilance Commission or other authority, as the case may be, the Disciplinary Authority is of the opinion that disciplinary proceedings should be instituted against the employee concerned, then notwithstanding the provisions of sub-regulation (2) of regulation 61, the enquiry under this regulation may be entrusted to a Commissioner for Departmental Enquiries or other person who may be nominated by the Central Vigilance Commission for this purpose.

(d) The Inquiry Officer shall submit his report to the Disciplinary Authority and the report shall be forwarded by the Competent Authority to the Central Vigilance Commission for its advice as to whether the charge or charges as the case may be, can be considered to have been established and the penalty or penalties to be imposed under regulation 60 hereof. The penalty or penalties to be imposed shall be decided by the Disciplinary Authority after considering the advice of the Central Vigilance Commission.

Explanation.—An employee shall be deemed to be guilty of corrupt practices if he has committed an act of criminal misconduct as defined in Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 or he has acted for an improper purpose or in a corrupt manner or had exercised or refrained from exercising his powers with an improper or corrupt motive.

Where this provision sits

ActThe Unique Identification Authority of India (Salary, Allowances and other Terms and Conditions of Service of Employees) Regulations, 2020
Section68
Marginal noteVigilance cases
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Unique Identification Authority of India (Salary, Allowances and other Terms and Cond… is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.