CourtMesh

Section 22: Presumption in certain cases.

The Warehousing (Development and Regulation) Act, 2007Central Act · Act 37 of 2007

In a dispute between an endorser of a negotiable warehouse receipt and his endorsee unless it is proved otherwise, it shall be presumed that--

(a) the endorsement has been made voluntarily;

(b) the endorsement has been made for full consideration;

(c) the endorser had full legal title in the goods represented by the receipt; and

(d) the endorsement has extinguished all the rights, title and interest of the endorser in the goods.

Where this provision sits

ActThe Warehousing (Development and Regulation) Act, 2007
Section22
Marginal notePresumption in certain cases.
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Warehousing (Development and Regulation) Act, 2007 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.