CourtMesh

Section 18C: Procedure when assessee claims identical question of law is pending before High Court or Supreme Court

The Wealth-Tax Act, 1957Central Act · Act 27 of 1957

[CHAPTER IVA

SPECIAL PROVISION FOR AVOIDING REPETITIVE APPEALS

Procedure when assessee claims identical question of law is pending before High Court or Supreme Court.

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where an assessee claims that any question of law arising in his case for an assessment year which is pending before the [Assessing Officer] or any appellate authority (such case being hereafter in this section referred to as the relevant case) is identical with a question of law arising in his case for another assessment year which is pending before the High Court or the Supreme Court on a reference under section 27 [or in appeal under section 27A before the High Court] or in appeal before the Supreme Court under section 29 (such case being hereafter in this section referred to as the other case), he may furnish to the [Assessing Officer] or the appellate authority, as the case may be, a declaration in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner, that if the [Assessing Officer] or the appellate authority, as the case may be, agrees to apply to the relevant case the final decision on the question of law in the other case, he shall not raise such question of law in the relevant case in appeal before any appellate authority or [in appeal before the High Court under section 27A or the Supreme Court under section 29].

(2) Where a declaration under sub-section (1) is furnished to any appellate authority, the appellate authority shall call for a report from the [Assessing Officer] on the correctness of the claim made by the assessee and, where the [Assessing Officer] makes a request to the appellate authority to give him an opportunity of being heard in the matter, the appellate authority shall allow him such opportunity.

(3) The [Assessing Officer] or the appellate authority, as the case may be, may, by order in writing,—

(i) admit the claim of the assessee if he or it is satisfied that the question of law arising in the relevant case is identical with the question of law in the other case ; or

(ii) reject the claim if he or it is not so satisfied.

(4) Where a claim is admitted under sub-section (3),—

(a) the [Assessing Officer] or, as the case may be, the appellate authority may make an order disposing of the relevant case without awaiting the final decision on the question of law in the other case ; and

(b) the assessee shall not be entitled to raise, in relation to the relevant case, such question of law in appeal before any appellate authority or [in appeal before the High Court under section 27A or the Supreme Court under section 29].

(5) When the decision on the question of law in the other case becomes final, it shall be applied to the relevant case and the [Assessing Officer] or the appellate authority, as the case may be, shall, if necessary, amend the order referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (4) conformably to such decision.

(6) An order under sub-section (3) shall be final and shall not be called in question in any proceeding by way of appeal, reference or revision under this Act.

Explanation.—In this section,—

(a) "appellate authority" means the [Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)], or the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal ;

(b) "case", in relation to an assessee, means any proceeding under this Act for the assessment of the net wealth of the assessee or for the imposition of any penalty on him.]

Where this provision sits

ActThe Wealth-Tax Act, 1957
Section18C
Marginal noteProcedure when assessee claims identical question of law is pending before High Court or Supreme Court
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • inserted. Inserted by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, w.e.f. 1-10-1984.
  • other. See rule 4C and Form DB.
  • substituted. Substituted for "Wealth-tax Officer" by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987, w.e.f. 1-4-1988.
  • inserted. Inserted by the Finance Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1-6-2002.
  • substituted. Substituted for "Wealth-tax Officer" by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987, w.e.f. 1-4-1988.
  • substituted. Substituted for "for a reference before the High Court or the Supreme Court under section 27 or in appeal before the Supreme Court under section 29" by the Finance Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1-6-2002.
  • substituted. Substituted for "Appellate Assistant Commissioner" by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987, w.e.f. 1-4-1988.

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Wealth-Tax Act, 1957 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.