CourtMesh

Section 55: Cognizance of offences.

The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972Central Act · Act 53 of 1972

[55. Cognizance of offences.-- No court shall take cognizance of any offence against this Act on the complaint of any person other than--

(a) the Director of Wild Life Preservation or any other officer authorised in this behalf by the Central Government; or

[(aa) the Member-Secretary, Central Zoo Authority in matters relating to violation of the provisions of Chapter IVA; or]

[(ab) Member-Secretary, Tiger Conservation Authority; or]

(ac) Director of the concerned tiger reserve; or

[(ad) the Management Authority or any officer, including an officer of the Wild Life Crime Control Bureau, authorised in this behalf by the Central Government; or]

(b) the Chief Wild Life Warden, or any other officer authorised in this behalf by the State Government [subject to such conditions as may be specified by that Government]; or

[(bb) the officer-in-charge of the zoo in respect of violation of provisions of section 38J; or]

(c) any person who has given notice of not less than sixty days, in the manner prescribed, of the alleged offence and of his intention to make a complaint, to the Central Government or the State Government or the officer authorised as aforesaid.].

(b) the Chief Wild Life Warden, or any other officer authorised in this behalf by the State Government [subject to such conditions as may be specified by that Government]; or

[(bb) the officer-in-charge of the zoo in respect of violation of provisions of section 38J; or]

(c) any person who has given notice of not less than sixty days, in the manner prescribed, of the alleged offence and of his intention to make a complaint, to the Central Government or the State Government or the officer authorised as aforesaid.]

Where this provision sits

ActThe Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
Section55
Marginal noteCognizance of offences.
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source
Judgments citing it2

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • substituted, Act 44 of 1991. . Subs. by Act 44 of 1991, s. 39, for section 55 (w.e.f. 2-10-1991).
  • inserted, Act 16 of 2003. . Ins. by Act 16 of 2003, s. 33 (w.e.f. 1-4-2003).
  • inserted, Act 39 of 2006. . Ins. by Act 39 of 2006, s. 4 (w.e.f. 4-9-2006).
  • inserted, Act 18 of 2022. . Ins. by Act 18 of 2022, s. 35 (w.e.f. 1-4-2023).
  • inserted, Act 16 of 2003. . Ins. by Act 16 of 2003, s. 33 (w.e.f. 1-4-2003).
  • inserted, Act 16 of 2003. . Ins. by Act 16 of 2003, s. 33 (w.e.f. 1-4-2003).

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.