Judgments citing the Indian Telegraphs Act, 1885
Court records that name the Indian Telegraphs Act, 1885 among the enactments on the case file, newest first. The list is built from the acts the registry itself recorded against each matter, not from a reading of the judgment.
11court records, free to read
1996 to 2025years covered
2courts and tribunals
Courts in this collection
Court records
- APL/943/2023 of NITIN BABARAO KADAM vs STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO, PS, BADNERA, TQ. AND DIST. AMRAVATI AND ANOTHERBombay High Court · 11 March 2025 · CNR HCBM040182052023
- S/635/1990 of RADHESHYAM GOEL vs MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAMLTD and SMT.SUNITA R.GOELBombay High Court · 14 December 2006 · CNR HCBM020007141990
- S/1699/1989 of SARJU INTERNATIONAL vs MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAMLTDBombay High Court · 14 December 2006 · CNR HCBM020003851989
- S/829/1989 of INDERJIT KAPUR vs M.T.N.LBombay High Court · 21 September 2006 · CNR HCBM020018271989
- S/1228/1993 of INDERJIT KAPUR vs MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAMLTDBombay High Court · 21 September 2006 · CNR HCBM020012731993
- S/2556/1987 of RCADHESHYAM GOEL vs MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTDBombay High Court · 24 August 2006 · CNR HCBM020009601987
- SCA/8033/1997 of TELEPHONE SUBSCRIBERS' ASSOCIATION vs UNION OF INDIAHigh Court of Gujarat · 17 February 2000 · CNR GJHC240175601997
- LPA/1229/1997 of GUJARAT HOTELS LTD vs THE GENERAL MANAGER,VADODARA TELEPHONESHigh Court of Gujarat · 9 October 1997 · CNR GJHC240089141997
- SCA/204/1996 of JAGDISH NATHALAL BARAI vs UNION OF INDIAHigh Court of Gujarat · 20 February 1997 · CNR GJHC240102091996
- SCA/2593/1996 of RAJENDRAKUMAR P SHARMA vs GENERAL MANAGERHigh Court of Gujarat · 31 January 1997 · CNR GJHC240125701996
- SCA/1597/1995 of AJAY RASIKLAL PATEL vs AHMEDABAD TELECOM DISTRICTHigh Court of Gujarat · 16 October 1996 · CNR GJHC240125171995
Need this as data, not as a page?CourtMesh holds 11 records in this collection. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Indian court case data coverage.
These are the case details as recorded by the courts. CourtMesh does not alter court records.