Justice G.T. Nanavati,S.N. Phukan: judgments and orders
Every court record in the CourtMesh library on which Justice G.T. Nanavati,S.N. Phukan sat, newest first. Each entry links to the full record: the parties, the bench, the case numbers, the dates and the disposal, exactly as the court published them.
13court records, free to read
1999 to 2000years covered
1court and tribunals
Courts in this collection
Court records
- LAXMAN NASKAR vs UNION OF INDIA & ORSSupreme Court of India · 15 February 2000 · Diary No. 5925/1999
- MANJEE SINGH vs STATE OF NCT OFDELHISupreme Court of India · 15 February 2000 · Diary No. 9337/1999
- RANDHIR BASIL vs STATE OF WEST BENGALSupreme Court of India · 7 February 2000 · Diary No. 2173/1999
- AEHOK KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANASupreme Court of India · 2 December 1999 · Diary No. 15640/1998
- GEETHA vs STATE OF KARNATAKASupreme Court of India · 2 December 1999 · Diary No. 2322/1997
- STATE OF U.P & ANR vs RAM KRISHNA & ANRSupreme Court of India · 30 August 1999 · Diary No. 15213/1998
- BALBIR SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJABSupreme Court of India · 19 August 1999 · Diary No. 11015/1998
- NATHU vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRASupreme Court of India · 4 August 1999 · Diary No. 2504/1998
- SUBHASH CHANDER SHARMA & ANR, STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS vs HARI KRISHAN & ORSSupreme Court of India · 14 May 1999 · Diary No. 4589/1998
- R.PAULSAMY vs UNION OF INDIA & ANRSupreme Court of India · 14 May 1999 · Diary No. 16793/1998
- KAKA SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJABSupreme Court of India · 5 May 1999 · Diary No. 3422/1998
- KANUJI S. ZALA vs STATE OF GUJARAT & ORSSupreme Court of India · 4 May 1999 · Diary No. 20738/1998
- SULEMAN AND ANR vs STATE OF DELHI THR. SECRETRYSupreme Court of India · 10 February 1999 · Diary No. 8731/1998
Need this as data, not as a page?CourtMesh holds 13 records in this collection. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.
These are the case details as recorded by the courts. CourtMesh does not alter court records.