lf the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant is unable, by reason of poverty. to pay the prescribed fees, he may remit any or all of such fees. If the case is decided in favour of the appllcant. the Prcscrtbed fees which, had they not been remitted, would have been due to be paid. may be added to the costs of the case and recovered in such manner as the Commtssioner in his order regarding costs may direct.
Section 34: Ezemption &om payment of coats
workmen_compensation_1926State Rules of Chhattisgarh · 1923
Where this provision sits
| Act | workmen_compensation_1926 |
|---|---|
| Section | 34 |
| Marginal note | Ezemption &om payment of coats |
| Jurisdiction | State of Chhattisgarh |
| Status | In force as published by the source |
Find the provision, not just read it
The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:
- Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
- Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
- Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
- Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you
Free account. No card. About a minute to create.
Create a free accountNeed this as data, not as a page? workmen_compensation_1926 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.