The East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, shall not apply nor shall be deemed to have ever applied to any land or building belonging to or vesting in the Board under or for the purposes of this Act, and as against the Board to any tenancies or other like relationship created by the Board in respect of such land or building but shall apply to any land or building let to the Board.
www v * C O M M E N T S Applicability of Rent Act -Allotment of houses made by Housing Board Authorities on Hire Purchase Basis - Provisions of Rent Control Act would be applicable to the allottee and his tenants 6r sub tenants,- An allottee can,induct a tenant in the allotted premises - Section 4 or thw Act is no bar to the applicability of E P Rent Act - AJqy-Kashyap v. Smt, MohiniNijliawan, 2004 H.R.R. 387 F,B.
.Provisions of the Act are applicable to the houses allotted under Haryana Housing Board Act, 1971 (As applicable to Chandigarh) - It is apparent from die prov isions of Section 4 of the Act read with Regulations 42,44 and 45 of Chandigarh Housing Board (Allotment, Management and Sale ofTenemenls) Regulation, \979 *~s"ubs. by Chd, Admn. Gaz. Notification fated I3.3-I975at page 34-33 I Subs by Hr Act 27 Of 1980 as extended to Chd. vide Chd. Admn. Goz. (extra) dt,2-4-l99l
2. Omiltcd by Chd. Admn. Caz. Nolifiwtiori dated 13-3-1975 at page 34-35 Haryana Hou3injj Doard Act, 1971 (as extended to Chandigarh) A9l -> The relationship between the Board and the allottee woul.l hr* thnt ^f* and its tenants - Allottee of Housing Board hasa rifft b ^ f f l , 5 ?L w ! * " ° W n c r relationship between the ullortcp fcunTi.- * ! l \ m d u c l a s u l v f e n an t arid Limited'scase A I R 1953 a i r in H i « ! n ? 1 A C o ~ 0 P e ^ ^ Housing Society is permitted to take up the pi™ of ap»Iicatk>iof S e c l f o n A S & U J ? ? ^ £ n a n j Kashyap v. A « . M , t o „ Nljhmv(m> 2?04 (1) I /f l R f 8 7 F S ** ^ aha la's case' 999 H R R S t , £ J? l ,8 inef t J deiVm!d i n ^ ^ " " j w w i t r a i n e d N E M S S , n S t c d feSS^™1!! 1 rm£Hencd«¥*»r<*unot ha 599 ^vis ion accepted ^ RumaSharma v Afe//o>- (7/?^^, 2004(1) [T.R.R.
(a holds any office or place of profit under the Board- ' (y is an undischarged insolvent- Sr Ji i t « convicted uf any offence involving moral tumitude 1(8)I m the opinion of the' {Administrator} - ^Piti ide.
(i) has become incapable uf acting or (H) is otherwise unfit to continue as a member.]
* Subs, by Ctidi Admn. Gna. Notification daiaf I-i i K I T * . — m 7 " ~ " — • • • - — 492 Haryana Housing Board Act, 1971 (as extended to Chandigarh)
(2) A person shall not be disqualified under clause (d) or clause (e) of sub section (1) or be deemed to have any share or interest in any contract or employ ment within the meaning of the said clause, by reason only of his or the incorpo rated company of which he is a Director, Secretary, Manager or other salaried officer having a share or interest in any newspaper in which any advertisement relating to the affairs ofthe Board is inserted.
(3) A person shall not also be disqualified under clause (d) or clause (e) or sub-seotion ( l ) or be deemed to have any share or interest in any incorporate company wh ich has any share or interest in any contract or employment with, by or on behalf of, the Board, by reason only of his being a shareholder of such C°mP<p ro 'vided that such person discloses to the '(Administrator] the nature and extent of the shares held by him.