CourtMesh

Section 29: Transfer of encumbrances.

The Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act.State Act of Maharashtra · Act 62 of 1947

(1) If the holding of an owner included in a scheme of consolidation which has come into force under section 22 is burdened with a ** mortgage, debt or other encumbrance [other than a lease] such ** mortgage, debt or other encumbrance shall be transferred therefrom and attach itself to the holding allotted to him under the scheme or to such part of it as the Consolidation Officer may, subject to any rules made under section 37, appoint; and the * * * mortgagee, creditor or other encumbrancer, as the case may be, shall exercise his rights accordingly.

(2) If the holding to which a * * mortgage, debt or other encumbrance is transferred under sub-section (1) is of less market value than the original holding from which it is transferred the * * * mortgagee, creditor or other encumbrancer, as the case may be, shall subject to the provisions of section 30 be entitled to the payment of such compensation by the owner of the holding, as the case may require, as the Consolidation Officer may determine.

(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 21, the Consolidation Officer shall in the prescribed manner, put any * * * mortgagee or other encumbrancer entitled to possession into possession of the holding to which his * * mortgage or other encumbrance has been transferred under sub-section (1).

Where this provision sits

ActThe Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act.
Section29
Marginal noteTransfer of encumbrances.
JurisdictionState of Maharashtra
StatusIn force as published by the source

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • omitted, Bom. 69 of 1953. The word "lease, " was deleted by Bom. 69 of 1953, s. 10(1).
  • inserted, Bom. 69 of 1953. These words were inserted by Bom. 69 of 1953, s. 10(2).
  • omitted, Bom. 69 of 1953. The word "lease, " was deleted by Bom. 69 of 1953, s. 10(1).
  • omitted, Bom. 69 of 1953. The word "lessee, " was deleted by Bom. 69 of 1953, s. 10(1).
  • omitted, Bom. 69 of 1953. The word "lease, " was deleted by Bom. 69 of 1953, s. 10(1).
  • omitted, Bom. 69 of 1953. The word "lessee, " was deleted by Bom. 69 of 1953, s. 10(1).
  • omitted, Bom. 69 of 1953. The word "lessee, " was deleted by Bom. 69 of 1953, s. 10(1).
  • omitted, Bom. 69 of 1953. The word "lease, " was deleted by Bom. 69 of 1953, s. 10(1).

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act. is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.