CourtMesh

Section 29A: Consolidation officer to decide whether lease should be transferred or not.

The Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act.State Act of Maharashtra · Act 62 of 1947

[29A. Consolidation Officer to decide whether lease should be transferred or not.- (1) If the holding of an owner included in a scheme of consolidation which has come into force under section 22 is burdened with a lease, the Consolidation Officer shall, by an order in writing determine whether such lease shall or shall not be transferred therefrom. A copy of the order passed by the Consolidation Officer under this sub-section shall be affixed to a place near the holding and shall also be published in the prescribed manner.

(2) If the Consolidation Officer determines that such lease shall be transferred from the original holding it shall attach itself to the holding allotted to the owner under the scheme or such part of it as the Consolidation Officer may, subject to any rules under section 37, appoint and the lessee shall exercise his rights accordingly. The provisions of sub-sections (2) and (3) of section 29 shall apply to such lease as if the lease were a mortgage or other encumbrance.

(3) If the Consolidation Officer determines that such lease shall not be transferred from the original holding it shall remain attached thereto, and the owner to whom such holding is allotted under the scheme shall hold it subject to such lease; and the provisions of the [relevant tenancy law], shall so far as may be notwithstanding the change in the ownership, apply to such lease; and the rights and liabilities of such owner and the lessee shall be governed by the provisions of the [said law] as between the landlord and his tenant:

Provided that such owners shall not be entitled to arrears of rent due under such lease immediately before the allotment of the holding as aforesaid.

(4) An appeal against the decision of the Consolidation Officer under this section shall lie to the Settlement Commissioner within the prescribed time.]

Where this provision sits

ActThe Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act.
Section29A
Marginal noteConsolidation officer to decide whether lease should be transferred or not.
JurisdictionState of Maharashtra
StatusIn force as published by the source

How this provision has been amended

Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.

  • inserted, Bom. 69 of 1953. Section 29A was inserted by Bom. 69 of 1953, s. 11.
  • substituted, Bom. 61 of 1958. These words were substituted for the words and figures "Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948" by Bom. 61 of 1958, s. 3(19)(i).
  • substituted, Bom. 61 of 1958. These words were substituted for the words "said Act" by Bom. 61 of 1958, s. 3(19)(ii).

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? The Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act. is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.