Section 30: Apportionment of compensation or net value in case of dispute.
The Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act.State Act of Maharashtra · Act 62 of 1947
Where there is a dispute in respect of the apportionment of-
(a) the amount of compensation determined under sub-section (2) of section 16 or sub-section (4) of section 17;
[(aa) the amount of compensation determined under section 18];
[(b) the amount of additional compensation or reduction in compensation determined under sub-section (4), or the net value realised or payable under sub-section (6) or (7) of section 21];
(c) the total amount of compensation determined under sub-section (2) of section 29,
the Consolidation Officer shall refer the dispute to the decision of the District Court and deposit the amount of the compensation of net value as the case may be, in the Court and thereupon the provisions of sections 33, 53 and 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (I of 1894), * * * * * shall, so far as may, apply.
Apportionment of compensation or net value in case of dispute.
Jurisdiction
State of Maharashtra
Status
In force as published by the source
How this provision has been amended
Taken from the footnotes printed with the provision by the source. Where a footnote names the amending instrument, it is quoted as printed.
inserted, Bom. 61 of 1958. This clause was inserted by Bom. 61 of 1958, s. 3(20).
substituted, Mah. 19 of 1966. This clause was substituted by Mah. 19 of 1966, s. 11(a).
omitted. The words "or the said provisions of that Act as applied to the Saurashtra area by the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Adaptation and Application) Ordinance, 1948" were omitted by the Maharashtra Adaptation of Laws (State and Concurrent Subjects) Order, 1960.
omitted, Mah. 19 of 1966. The words and figures "or, as the case may be, of section 28 or section 43 of the Hyderabad Land Acquisition Act, 1309, Fasli" were deleted by Mah. 19 of 1966, s. 11(b).
Find the provision, not just read it
The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:
Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you
Need this as data, not as a page? The Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act. is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.
