No person, being the owner or person in charge of any dog, shall neglect to restrain it so that it shall be at large in any street without a muzzle,- a. if such dog is likely to annoy or intimidate public ; or b. if the Municipality has by public notice during the prevalence of rabies, directed that dogs shall not be at large without muzzles.
Section 454: Suffering dogs not to be at large
The Nagaland Municipal Act,2001State Act of Nagaland · Act 10 of 2001
Where this provision sits
| Act | The Nagaland Municipal Act,2001 |
|---|---|
| Section | 454 |
| Marginal note | Suffering dogs not to be at large |
| Jurisdiction | State of Nagaland |
| Status | In force as published by the source |
Find the provision, not just read it
The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:
- Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
- Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
- Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
- Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you
Free account. No card. About a minute to create.
Create a free accountNeed this as data, not as a page? The Nagaland Municipal Act,2001 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.