CourtMesh

Section 7: gir•TT,,,f7 fT9Tror xfata it 317714r

National-Security-Guard-adjustment-of-Jurisdiction-Rule-1987Central Rules · 1986

( 1) IfT fffT4 5 TT h Tref1-1" afi 3 rrr *It 1147 Tfr-Iff fatrr 74r97 tprifEirik n'i'griq9 Tr warTra7: ar trot4 vrf47577-7, tf,xt *-7141 fc -Fur tE743-r ;114171" r;Tri qi. 94-1 fqtri-7,4 f*4-1- “rr a'sThr fa*4 44r 9.4rerirrtlrim* 7rt tfr ?fit 7,114 Nit ‘91 71' 9497 trqr t.

(2) wq. 17-14 -c ( 1 ) wrira- I144 tvt7. Purr fi6 uFa1;15 9r f*477-4 4gy, f*-97 447 ar . flti4" /f.q NrelTiTrft *7440. 9-git • trf, 41- arr4 f44 vrit4 947 R47 497 t, xti-44z cifefgritet 4 97-i: if, Trt;troraFrr vera- zit *414 ■44741;•1T, * 47744 it, tot

4.14r;r9-9 +--<4 * 41-r44 arm,* fIr

414tira.- atift9 fkrat Pea- it 41414 air -4rti s. fdr4174 ;474744. 44mar tr k f ii ititt 4rv,7 f4fgt f94;t1 ># 4791-4,7, f** 47, w4i- I** ltf*??: la /49- *771 irk 4(4 .•*r* 4 f* 4titf444 4.91-4 • tsTF41- Tr& r1qf frrr k, flo-ret TrT7r VT waft T:6[Tig)* 46C4I fiR 74147 r 4rfi,4 417:

3.07 ;a ,ITF ,srfIT Trifort ar 9.4-TT fifiT fTg.). 31.TT, aTi 1:(11;72:f 9 aft AlzffIr q11 rt,* f4P-4-9- Saar u-777, LatestLaws.com IIIM 3(i1)] stTra' 7aT4 : wsitUlaw 3 azffiR 4; Tiff Ti, fafffT Iff?ffT, uTft f41:7a sFricey f6I *. frit 3-j a-Ulf T T: 3if craf,- jT qrfq./ ft:ir 3f(k ark iTrailz t zrr 1( Tt:t Ow wr. siffif qr 3-4T417ff qtiref 0417). f, urn vff r f A';

qtrff -Terr lt-Tr,T(7. Ti k.917.:111T1144 3f4kTfr7ff T7k Bier )1ffai Vffiefft xfIg'fiff Wr4r'r wfkit

9. if-T: W.I.: 1-- 711( T SUIT re if TA 4 Wft.'11 f4“: t, if:: fry A-Cirrn* 714 if Ti 14 fel' it TETTf5 If 1ff 14'; sfr.

f.444 8 if IT'it.:114 fifty 'Tr, 47. fITT/44. vcft Pr 3 T.-fr ic7if IFfr 47,c.1!- 44'4 141, 47:

Tigir-f itf..-rf:7;•!: r1;11 f8t4i VT;

T74.4 11 5 f -f f -6; -Tt.-4f AfS rice- T mrrf gcc •311 111"1-11. firiTi 1 [xt. 47-16011/4/86-79..n.Tf.q)-.1 fef.,. 3(i, 41f/ f4tR4 Alimslrity OF HOME AFFAIRS NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 21st January, 1987 S.O. 24(h).—ln exercise of the powers conferred by clause

(q) of sub-section (2) of section 139 of the National Security Guard Act, 1986 147 of 1936), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules, namely :— I, Short title.--These rules may be called the Criminal Courts and Security Guard Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1987.

2, Definitions,—In these rules,' unless the context otherwise requires :—

(i) "Act" means the National Security Guard Act, 1986 (47 of 1986) ;

(ii) "Commander" in relation to a person subject to the Act, means the Officer Commanding the unit or detachment to which such person belongs or is attached Oil "Competent Authority" means the, Director-General, Inspector-General, or a Deputy inspector-General of the National Security Guard ;

(iv) words and expression used in these rules and not defined but defined in the Act, shall have the meaning resnectively assigned to them in the Act.

3. Trial of person subject to the Act,--Where a person subject to the Act, brought before a Magistrate and charged with an offence for which he is liable to be tried by u Security Guard Coon, such Magistrate shall not proceed to tfy such person or to inquire with a view to his Commitment for trial by the Court of Sessions or the High Court for any offence triable by such Court, unless,—

(a) he is of the opinion, for reasons to be recorded in writing that he should so proceed without being moved thereto by the competent authority ; or

(b) he is moved thereto by such authority.

4, Notice by Magistrate.—Before proceeding under clause ta) of rule 3, the Magistrate shall give Written notice to the Commander of the accused and until the expiry of a period of :—

(j) three weeks, in the case of a notice given to a Commander in command of a unit or detachment..

located in any of the following areas, that is to say :— Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya and North Cachar Hill Districts of Assam, or

(ii) ten days in the case of a notice given to any other Commander in command of a unit or detachment located elsewhere in India, from the date of the service of such notice, he shall not,_

(a) convict or acquit the accused under section 252 or section 255 (1), (2) or section 256 or section 257 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or hear him in his defence under section 254 of the said Code ; or

(b) frame in writing a charge against the accused under section 246 of the said Code ; or

(c) make an order committing the accused for trial by the High Court or the Court of Sessions under section 192 of the said Code ; or (dl transfer the case for inquiry or trial under section 192 of the said Code.

5, Procedure on notice to the Magistrate.—Where within the period mentioned in rule 4 above, or at any time thereafter before the Magistrate has done any act or made any order referred to in that rule, the Commander of the accused or the competent authority, as the case may 'he, gives notice to the Magistrate that in the opinion of such authovity, the accused should he tried by a Security Guard Court, the Magistrate shall stay proceedings and if the accused is in his power or under .his control, shall deliver him with the statement prescribed in sub-section (1) of section 475 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (2 of 1974) to the authority specified in the said sub-section.

Where this provision sits

ActNational-Security-Guard-adjustment-of-Jurisdiction-Rule-1987
Section7
Marginal notegir•TT,,,f7 fT9Tror xfata it 317714r
JurisdictionCentral
StatusIn force as published by the source

Find the provision, not just read it

The full text above is free, and it stays free. What a free CourtMesh account adds is everything you cannot do by reading one page at a time:

  • Search 49,000+ Central and State enactments by what a provision says, not by its number
  • Jump from any section to every judgment that has applied it
  • Search 300 million+ Indian court records alongside the statute
  • Ask a research agent to find and read the case law on a provision for you

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

Need this as data, not as a page? National-Security-Guard-adjustment-of-Jurisdiction-Rule-1987 is one of 49,000+ enactments on CourtMesh. The Indian court cases API serves the case law that cites these provisions over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also the judgment library.