WP/351/2001 of SHRI AIRES RODRIGUES vs SHRI ZOIVONTA E.POROBO and 5 ORS

Bombay High CourtWP19 September 2002

About this record

The Bombay High Court decided this matter on 19 September 2002. The registry identifies it as CNR HCBM050001392001. It was heard by Justice V.C. Daga,p. V. Hardas.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The appointment of the first Respondent as President of the Goa Administrative Tribunal w…". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Goa, Daman & Diu Administrative Tribunal Act, 1965, Goa, Daman & Diu Administrative Tribunal Rules, 1966 and Goa Administrative Tribunal Act, 1965 (amended in 1966 and 2001). 15 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
Court	Bombay High Court
Record type	WP
Case number	CNR HCBM050001392001
Date of decision	19 September 2002
Decision year	2002
Bench	V.C. DAGA,P. V. HARDAS
Petitioner	SHRI AIRES RODRIGUES
Respondent	SHRI ZOIVONTA E.POROBO and 5 ORS.
Disposal	The appointment of the first Respondent as President of the Goa Administrative Tribunal was quashed and set aside.
Acts	Goa, Daman & Diu Administrative Tribunal Act, 1965 Goa, Daman & Diu Administrative Tribunal Rules, 1966 Goa Administrative Tribunal Act, 1965 (amended in 1966 and 2001) Goa School Education Act, 1984 Goa University Statutes Goa Municipalities Act, 1968 Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act Goa, Daman and Diu Sales Tax Act, 1964 Goa, Daman and Diu Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1964 Goa Tax on Luxuries (Hotels and Lodging Houses) Act, 1988 Goa, Daman and Diu Public Gambling Act, 1976 Code of Communidade, 1961
Sections	Article 233 of the Constitution of India Article 236 of the Constitution of India Section 3, Sub-Section (2) of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1965 Section 7 of the Goa Administrative Tribunal Act, 1965 Section 10 of the Act Section 11 of the Act Section 13 of the Goa Administrative Tribunal Act, 1965 Section 22 of the Goa School Education Act, 1984 Section 184(B) of the Goa Municipalities Act, 1968 Section 149(2) of the Goa Co-operative Societies Act Section 3(A)(1) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Sales Tax Act, 1964 Section 22 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1964 Section 49 and 50 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 Section 24 and 25 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkar Protection from Eviction Act Section 52(5) of the Goa Municipalities Act
Provisions on CourtMesh	Article 233, The Constitution of India

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Registry identifier: CNR HCBM050001392001
Court and date: Bombay High Court, 19 September 2002
Permanent address of this record: https://courtmesh.ai/judgment/bombay-high-court/2002/wp-351-2001-of-shri-aires-rodrigues-vs-shri-zoivonta-e-porobo-and-5-2002-6631fb

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Bombay High Court. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Bombay High Court data coverage.

Inside the full case file

HeadnoteUnlocks with a free account

Key Facts

Legal Issues

Arguments Holding Legal Principles Case History with Orders Similar Cases Full judgment text

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
Every order and document on the record, ready to read
The full judgment exactly as the court published it
AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.