CourtMesh

SA/1451/2004 of SHRI EKNATH HARI WAREKAR vs SOU. SULBHA ANKUSH MAYEKAR AND ORS

Bombay High CourtSA

About this record

The Bombay High Court decided this matter on 23 December 2004. The registry identifies it as CNR HCBM010293032004. It was heard by Justice P.V. Kakade.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeal dismissed; decree for possession upheld".

Court record

Court record details
CourtBombay High Court
Record typeSA
Case numberCNR HCBM010293032004
Date of decision
Decision year2004
BenchHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE P.V. KAKADE
PetitionerSHRI EKNATH HARI WAREKAR
RespondentSOU. SULBHA ANKUSH MAYEKAR AND ORS.
DisposalAppeal dismissed; decree for possession upheld

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Bombay High Court. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Bombay High Court data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.